Paoletti: Is Brady truly happy with this win?

191543.jpg

Paoletti: Is Brady truly happy with this win?

By Mary Paoletti
CSNNE.com

SAN DIEGO -- A win is a win, right?

That's essentially what Patriots quarterback Tom Brady said on Sunday night.

"It feels good to win those games when you don't play great,'' he said. "You have to win these games when you have an opportunity."

He was right. The Pats' 23-20 victory over San Diego wasn't a "great" game by any stretch of the imagination. It was ugly, even. The Chargers shot themselves in the foot again and again -- three fumbles being just part of the problem -- but New England never decisively capitalized on the scoreboard.

Brady was asked about his team's first-half effort.

"What offense?" he responded. "We had a hard time moving at all. We couldn't get into a rhythm at all. The second half was better, but I don't think it was great by any stretch."

He criticized but did it gently. It was the expected response from the Patriots' perfect politician.

"I have a lot of confidence when we play a lot better. We are still working at it. I wouldn't say we are in playoff form. But I will say we are 5-1,'' he said. "We've played some tough teams and defenses. We are just trying to improve.''

Sure thing, Tom.

He made his statements and the reporters all wrote them down. But something was off. His smile held no warmth; the words didn't match the mood. For however thrilled Brady was to have an improved record, he wasn't a happy guy on Sunday night. He answered just six questions, delivered his answers vanilla, and took off.

Nobody had a chance to ask about his accuracy.

Maybe it's because the stats speak for themselves. Brady hasn't had a first half yardage tally as bad as Sunday's 35 since September of 2006 when Buffalo held him to a measly 30. The rest of the numbers were equally disconcerting: 6-for-16 on completions, three sacks, and a 66.7 quarterback rating.

How very not-Tom.

The sacks weren't exactly shocking. San Diego entered the game as best in the NFL in sacks per pass play (21 total). But to that point, the clever Brady met the weekend being dropped just eight times while holding the football.

He finally started rising to his own high standard in the third quarter. It was a similar turnaround to last weekend's come-from-behind win over Baltimore. Slowly and surely, Brady picked away at the Chargers' defense to piece together a 17-play possession that stretched over almost nine minutes and resulted in a touchdown.

"We needed that,'' he said of the drive. "We've done that scoring a couple times right after halftime. But we have to do a better job starting the game and taking advantage of turnovers. I have to do a better job of finding open guys.''

"But like I said, it's great to get the win,'' he added.

There's that bottom line again.

The finish line certainly wasn't where Brady's focus was during the last practice week. On Wednesday Brady said that "In a game like this against San Diego you can't just play 30 minutes of football." Well, the Patriots probably only played a solid eight minutes on Sunday.

But New England won the game.

Brady also said: "There's not one position on this team that can't have their best game." If he had stayed around long enough for someone to ask, the Patriots QB could not have said that he played his best.

But, again, New England won the game.

Not giving up is a good thing -- that much is fact.

"One thing that we've shown is that we are going to keep fighting all the way to the end," the quarterback stated.

You just have wonder how far the Pats can take this season being "good enough."

Tom Brady will undoubtedly think about it. No matter what he says.

Mary Paoletti can be reached at mpaoletti@comcastsportsnet.com. Follow Mary on Twitter at http:twitter.comMary_Paoletti.

Colts LB who helped spark Deflategate suspended for PED use

patriots-top-100-plays-dqwell-jackson-number-32.jpg

Colts LB who helped spark Deflategate suspended for PED use

Deflategate started with an email. An accusation. An assumption. But it couldn't be pushed into Theater of the Absurd territory until the Colts had a Patriots football to play with. 

They got one when linebacker D'Qwell Jackson picked off Tom Brady in the AFC title game in January of 2015. Now, almost two years later, after Brady fought and later accepted a four-game suspension, Jackson has been slapped with a four-game suspension of his own. And this time, one would have to assume, there's evidence.

The NFL announced on Tuesday that Jackson has violated the league's policy on performance-enhancing drugs and will be suspended for the remainder of the regular season.

The 33-year-old leads the Colts in tackles and has not missed a start for Indy since joining the team before the start of the 2014 season. He is eligible to return for the playoffs should the Colts get that far. With a record of 6-6, they are in a three-way tie for the AFC South lead.

Jackson has denied that he had anything to do with his team's pursuit of punishing the Patriots, telling the Boston Globe last year, "Twenty years from now I’m sure people will still kind of flirt around with it, so I guess it will be cool [to be connected to Deflategate]. Everything else that came out of that was nothing I had anything to do with. That’s above me. It wasn’t anything I had any part in."

Since we've come this far and you're still reading, here's a reminder of how Jackson factored into this whole thing: After his pick, per the Wells Report, he gave the Patriots football to Colts executive David Thornton. Thornton then handed it to assistant equipment manager Brian Seabrooks, who thought the ball was soft, and asked an equipment intern to check the pressure. The PSI was allegedly 11. Seabrooks then gave the ball to Colts equipment man Sean Sullivan, who alerted general manager Ryan Grigson. That led Grigson to make his way to a press-box suite with vice president of operations Mike Kensil and executive vice president of operations Troy Vincent. "We are playing with a small ball," Grigson supposedly said. 

You're probably familiar with what happened after that.

Belichick explains matching in the secondary

Belichick explains matching in the secondary

FOXBORO – Here’s a leftover from last week I’m dredging up because it’s really instructive in giving insight to something we all flap our arms about: how the Pats decide whether to play zone, man-to-man or match receivers with their secondary.

The jumping off-point was asking about Trumaine Johnson -- a long-tall corner for the Rams. As Belichick about Johnson and the difficulties he poses, at 6-foot-2, it brought to mind the team’s acquisition earlier this season of Eric Rowe. The 6-2 corner they got from the Eagles filled a need in that the Patriots other corners are not very tall, headlined by 5-9 Malcolm Butler.

So I asked Belichick if the team strives to have different sized players in the secondary.

“That’s if you move them around,” he explained, meaning size only matters if you intend to put size-on-size. “If you don’t move them around, if you play a guy at one positon and he plays on the right side or the left side, you cover the guy that’s over there, which I’d say is more the situation than not. There are some teams or some situations where you’ve got him, he’s got the next guy, you’ve got somebody else, but I’d say that’s by far the lower percentage of the plays, by far. Generally, you see a corner play – some games are different. We’ll match to this guy and somebody else matches to that guy. Teams will do that. There’s some of that, but by and large, most teams play at one position and whoever is in that spot, that’s who they cover.”

With matching receivers being the exception rather than the rule, the next logical question is why? Why would you let a little guy cover a big guy if you also have a big guy who could cover?

Because offenses make it complicated, Belichick answered.

“The easiest thing in the world is for one player to match another,” he explained. “‘OK, you go cover this guy.’ Alright, great. But what do the other 10 guys do? That’s the problem. It’s easy to matchup one guy. That’s simple. What do the other 10 guys do? What if he’s here? What if he’s there? What if he goes in motion? What if he’s in the backfield? What if it’s this personnel? What if it’s that personnel in the game? Then how does all the rest of it matchup? That’s where it gets tricky.  You can be spending all day, literally, on that. OK yeah, you take this guy but what are you going to do with the other 10?”

Belichick also delved into other options including a coverage concept the Pats used when Darrelle Revis was here. Giving Revis the opponent’s so-called No. 2 receiver and doubling the No. 1.

“You can matchup and put your best guy on their best guy, or you can matchup and put your best guy on let’s call it their second best guy and put your second best guy on their best guy and double him,” Belichick said. “If you’re going to put your best guy on their best guy and double him anyway then you kind of lessen the matchups down the line. It’s like setting a tennis ladder, or whatever. If you put your bad guy at one and you win two through seven, great. If you put your best guy at one and he gets beat by their one and then your two versus their two, you know. That’s what you’re doing. You have a three to four-man ladder there with the receivers and your DB’s [defensive backs], except we don’t have to match them that way. You can match them however you want.”

It’s a fascinating discussion and it comes into play the next two weeks as the Patriots will see a true test with receivers like the Ravens Steve Smith and Denver with Emmanuel Sanders and Demaryius Thomas.

The Patriots will have decisions to make. Chances are they’ll use a little bit of everything. But these are some of the the things they weight when doing so.