Enemy Intel: How'd the Colts do in the draft?

191543.jpg

Enemy Intel: How'd the Colts do in the draft?

By Tom E. Curran
CSNNE.com

The Colts' draft approach is the inverse of the Patriots. They wait for their turn to come. They take a player. They wait for their turn to come. They take a player. And while their overall team-building approach has been good enough to make them a quasi-dynasty - or at least the greatest team in the history of the AFC South - the draft hasn't been a strong suit, as evidenced by the four drafts preceding this year's.The best players they've taken in that span were Jacob Tamme, Austin Collie, Pierre Garcon and Clint Session. Tamme, Collie and Garcon's resumes to date have been aided by the fact Peyton Manning throws them the football. This year? Seemed very good. In the first round, the Colts took Boston College left tackle Anthony Castonzo. The Colts' offensive line has been borderline embarrassing the past two seasons. Indy allowed it to get old and brittle. They couldn't run block at all. Their protection of Manning - especially against higher-tier teams - was atrocious last season. Castonzo becomes the first offensive linemen the Colts have drafted since team president Bill Polian took over in Indy. Ironically, Polian's son Chris "ran" this draft. Indy came back in the secondround, making a deal to get up and draft Villanova offensive lineman Ben Ijalana. Castonzo will go to left guard; Ijalana becomes either a right tackle or a guard. TheColts came back in the thirdround and got Drake Nevis, a defensive tackle from LSU. Nevis is just 6-1 but he's swollen up to 308. My buddy Wes Bunting at the National Football Post loves him in a scheme like the Colts with asks for penetration from the D-line. Nevis gets off the ball fast and "violently," according to Bunting, and for a team that's also allowed 4.2, 4.3 and 4.6 yards per carry against it the past three seasons, they need D-line assistance .In the fourth round, they again went for a direct statistical need and took a running back, 5-9, 225-pound Delone Carter from Syracuse. He's a between-the-tackles guy and maybe can be the correct complement for the Colts running game that helps Donald Brown be less of a disappointment than he has been. The Colts took a corner in the sixth round, a kid named Mike Rucker from Michigan State. SUMMARYThe Colts were in decline. Manning's ability effectively masked that fact until last year. Butthe talent drain caused by age and years of unimaginativedrafting was approaching critical mass. They moved to fix that this year. Two rookie offensive linemen and an undersized but explosive defensive lineman aren't going to alter everything. But at least Indy moved to protect its asset, Manning.

Tom E. Curran can be reached at tcurran@comcastsportsnet.com. Follow Tom on Twitter at http:twitter.comtomecurran

Felger: Is the praise for Jacoby Brissett too good to be true?

praisebrissett503_1280x720_678827587973.jpg

Felger: Is the praise for Jacoby Brissett too good to be true?

Three mid-week thoughts for your perusal . . . 

-- I was 100 percent behind the drafting of quarterback Jacoby Brissett. And then I read comments about the kid from Charlie Weis and Bill Parcells in Karen Guregian's excellent story in the Boston Herald on Tuesday.

Now I'm down to about 80 percent.

"He's a Curtis Martin-, Willie McGinest-, Troy Brown-type of player,'' said Parcells. "That's the kind of guy he is. That's what New England is getting. Those kind, those Tedy Bruschi types, those players who've been successful -- he's very similar in his personal life to those kinds of guys.''

"Let me tell you,'' added Weis, "this kid, from the time he was in high school, is the Pied Piper . . . He was definitely the leader of the pack. In the quarterback position, I think that's a critical factor. And that's what he was.''

Added Parcells: "He has zero personal issues.''

So why would glowing reports cause me to like the pick less? File under: Too good to be true.

I read those quotes and get the feeling I'm being sold something, which shakes my confidence a bit. Plus, it's a little too much on the intangible element. Character is certainly important at the position. In fact, it's crucial. But if intangibles were the only thing that mattered, Tim Tebow would have been an NFL QB. And we all know how that turned out.

Bottom line: I still like the pick. I still want the Pats drafting and developing quarterbacks. I just smell a bit of bull crap.

-- Chris Mannix nailed it regarding what it would take for the Celtics to lure Kevin Durant to Boston.

"Boston's ability to lure him is going to come down to who else they can get. You can't walk into a meeting with Kevin Durant and say, 'We've got Isiah Thomas and 97 draft picks; we're going to be good in a few years','' he told Toucher and Rich Tuesday morning. "Kevin doesn't want to hear that . . . What he wants to hear is that we're ready to win now . . . They have to come to the table with a Jimmy Butler, with a Bradley Beal, with an Al Horford. They can't just come with Brad Stevens, Danny Ainge and a bunch of draft picks.''

In other words, the pieces on the current roster aren't nearly as good as they looked in the regular season. And, no, Thomas is not a franchise player. And, finally, don't get too attached to those picks, no matter where the ping pong balls land.

-- I wonder if the Bruins look at the current landscape in net across the NHL playoffs and consider how wise it is to pay their goalie, Tuukka Rask, $7 million a year.

Still alive are guys like the Islanders' Thomas Greiss ($1.5 million cap hit), the Blues' Brian Ellliott ($2.5 million), the Sharks' Martin Jones ($3 million) and Penguins rookie Matt Murray ($620,000). Out are 8 of the top 10 highest-paid goalies in the league, a list including Henri Lundqvist, Carey Price, Cory Schneider, Ryan Miller and, of course, Rask.

Please note: No one is saying you can get away with shoddy goaltending in the playoffs. It's an unassailable fact that you need elite play in net to contend for Stanley Cups. The question is what you have to pay for it. 

And in that regard, this year is no aberration. Sometimes you have to pay through the nose for it, and sometimes it just falls in your lap.

Can the Bruins get away with trying to survive in that second camp? Good question. This much I know: Paying Rask $7 million a year to miss the playoffs two straight years isn't doing anyone any good.

Email Felger at mfelger@comcastsportsnet.com. Listen to Felger and Mazz weekdays, 2-6 p.m. on 98.5 FM. The simulcast runs daily on CSN.