Patriots only have second-rounders to move

746696.jpg

Patriots only have second-rounders to move

FOXBORO - Bill Belichick was happy Thursday night that the Patriots didn't have to part with either of their second-round picks to trade up in the first round.

But those two second rounders - 48 and 62 overall - are all the Patriots currently have left in the 2012 NFL Draft.

The Patriots have made 35 picks in rounds three-through-seven since 2007. Unless they make a deal in the next two days, that number will stay at 35.

It's unusual. And it may change. But if it doesn't and the Patriots don't deal either of those second-rounders for more picks (or deal a current player for more picks like, say, Brian Hoyer), where will the Patriots go in the second round?

Here are some of the more recognizable names that dropped through the first round.

There are three pretty good defensive backs out there still - Montana's Trumaine Johnson, North Alabama's Janoris Jenkins and Georgia corner Brandon Boykin. Boykin's the most intriguing because he has skills in all three phsases of the game.

Wide receiver Stephen Hill hasn't landed yet, nor has LSU's Rueben Randle, Rutgers' Mohamed Sanu, South Carolina's Alshon Jeffery or Appalachian State's Brian Quick.

The Patriots have probably addressed the edge of their front-seven with Chandler Jones so UConn's Kendall Reyes, Clemson's Andre Branch and Marshall's Vinny Curry are all on the board still.

On the offensive line, Georgia's Cordy Glenn, Ohio State's Mike Adams, Wisconsin's Peter Konz (a guardcenter), Michigan center David Molk, Stanford tackle Jonathan Martin and Midwestern State guard Amini Silatolu are all on the board.

And with only three running backs off the board, almost that whole group is there. Watch for Cyrus Gray of Texas A&M and Chris Polk of Washington when the Patriots select.

Finally, I'm a Kirk Cousins guy. The Michigan State quarterback - if Hoyer is dealt (just spitballing here, folks) would be a new Michigan State understudy for Tom Brady and competition for Ryan Mallett.

Blakely: Game 4 loss shows just how much Celtics miss Isaiah

Blakely: Game 4 loss shows just how much Celtics miss Isaiah

CLEVELAND --  Down the stretch in Game 4, the Celtics were desperate for someone, anyone, who could slow down Kyrie Irving.
 
But short of that, Boston could have used an offensive closer, too. You know, someone like Isaiah Thomas.

GAME 4: CAVS 112, CELTICS 99

 

The Celtics have relied on the two-time All-Star to carry much of the offensive burden this season, but he was almost always at his best in the fourth quarter.
 
A right hip injury knocked him out of this series after 1 1/2 games. Still, Boston managed to win Game 3 without him and, for large chunks of Tuesday night, seemed poised to beat the Cavs again on their home floor.
 
But as much as Game 4 was a reminder of just how special a talent Irving is (42 points, 21 in the third quarter when the game’s momentum swung in Cleveland's favor), it also provided a clue to the clueless who thought the Celtics were actually better without Isaiah Thomas.
 
Defensively?
 
Absolutely.
 
It’s no secret that teams go to great lengths to try and use his 5-foot-9 stature against him. And as we have seen, the deeper we get into the postseason the more trouble he and the Celtics seem to encounter from a defensive standpoint.
 
But just as we praise Irving for being such a special talent, Thomas has shown that he, too, has offensive gifts that, throughout this season, have left many fans, media and defenders befuddled as to how “the little fella” keeps coming up with one big play, one big shot after another.
 
But as we have learned, he has been dealing with a sore right hip injury for several weeks. The pain and discomfort eventually became too much to bear and so the Celtics did the right thing and shut him down.
 
Without him, the C's are still a good team that on any given night can knock off anyone, even the defending champs.
 
But as Game 4 reminded us, they need Thomas in order to be their best.
 
When Irving torched Boston’s entire defense with jumpers, ankle-breaking crossovers, Euro-step lay-ups and free throws, the Celtics had no one to turn to who could maybe, just maybe, go back at Irving at the other end of the floor.
 
That's what Thomas does that makes him such a special, unique talent in this league.
 
He can score in a variety of ways, with the best in the NBA.
 
We saw that this past season, when he led all players in the Eastern Conference in scoring with a 28.9 points-per-game average.
 
Boston’s excellent ball movement and high assist numbers are certainly important to the team’s success. But to make a deep and meaningful playoff run, you need one or two guys who can just go get buckets regardless of what the opponent does defensively.
 
That’s not Avery Bradley.
 
That’s not Al Horford.
 
That’s not Kelly Olynyk.
 
You can search, poke and prod this roster all you want, and you'll come up empty when it comes to finding a player like that . . . other than Isaiah Thomas.
 
The fact the Celtics were able to avoid getting swept is a victory of sorts in itself. Boston’s coaching staff, as well as the front office, has repeatedly said that as talented as their team is, they aren’t on the same level of the defending champion Cavaliers.
 
And yet here we are four games into this series and the Celtics are basically a bad half of basketball away from being tied, 2-2.
 
It says a lot about their mental toughness, their ability to handle and navigate past adversity to give themselves a chance to be competitive against any team -- including the Cavs.
 
But their success this season has always been about the collective group, regardless of how many late-game shots Isaiah Thomas knocks down.
 
And while he has his shortcomings defensively, not having him available is going to hurt them in those late-game moments when they need a closer. It’s not a coincidence the Celtics were just 2-4 when he didn’t play during the regular season.
 
So as cool as it was for them to win Game 3 without Thomas, he’s still the straw that stirs the Celtics emotionally, bringing them to levels few think they're capable of reaching.
 
They were able to get by for one night without him, but remember this: It took Marcus Smart having an Isaiah Thomas-like game of 27 points and seven made 3’s, for them to win.
 
No one did anything remotely close to that Tuesday night.
 
They looked like the Isaiah Thomas-less Celtics, which is a look they don’t need this time of year.
 
Because that look is so not about winning.