Our submission for the NHL's new concussion protocol


Our submission for the NHL's new concussion protocol

By Justin Aucoin

The NHL began its new concussion protocol last night. Any players suspected of having a concussion has to sit in a quiet room for 15 minutes while a team physician examines him.

Exactly what this protocol will entail is still TBD, of course.

Per PuckDaddy:

"Yeah, they're still working on the protocol, but it does take effect and the loose ends are being tied up. It's a pretty tough protocol to deal with. What is deemed a concussion? I don't want to go there yet. We're still trying to nail it down." NHL VP Colin Campbell

You dont want to go there yet? Youre enacting a protocol but arent sure whats deemed a concussion nor want to talk about it? Wow. Were sure the players are feeling safer already.

Nothing like enacting a protocol that doesnt seem to have any direction, nor is close to completion.

But since the NHL is still working out the kinks, as it were, we decided to lend a helping hand in them deciding if someone has a concussion with a mere five questions.

Note: Were not doctors; nor do we play one on TV. But we have a blog so, clearly, were experts.

1. How many fingers am I holding up?
a. 2 (2 pts. Hes a hockey player; he might not know how to count)
b. 4 (1 pts. See above; it could be a lucky guess)
c. Oh god, oh god! Why is Ralph Wiggum my physician? (10 pts. Though its a legit question)

2. What do you think hit you?
a. Car (5 pts)
b. Truck (10 pts)
c. Johnny Boychuk (50 pts)

3. What actually hit you?
a. Mike Giardi (2 pts. Really, Secret Agent Giardi did this to him? Hes probably faking.)
b. Mary Paoletti (25 pts. Never make fun of UConn again!)
c. Johnny Boychuk (-50 pts. He survived the hit; that counts for something right?)
d. Matt CookeTrevor GillesOther goons (10 pts. Probably got an elbow to the head)

4. Who are you?
a. Insert name (5 pts. Mightve just read the nameplate of their jersey)
b. Marc Savard (100 pts)
c. My name or my idegosuper-ego? (-5 pts for being so lucid)

5. What do you see?
a. A face (2 pts. Not bad)
b. Nothing (5 pts. No imagination)
c. My MRI? (15 pts. Theyre right)

Score Sheet
0 -20 = No concussion. Free to return.
21 50 = Possible concussion. Flip a coin.
51 = Definitely a concussion. Keep him out. Call the NHL or, if youre in Montreal, call 911.

He can go back and play unless hes the star forward for the away team of an interdivision rival in a tight hockey game; then hes kept out.

Celtics-Heat preview: Do C's need to bounce back from a win?

Celtics-Heat preview: Do C's need to bounce back from a win?

BOSTON – The final score on the Jumbotron Friday night said the Celtics beat the Phoenix Suns 130-120.
But there was a clear and undeniable sense of loss on the part of the Celtics, even if Friday’s victory was their third in a row and sixth in the past seven games.
The Celtics (47-26) hope to continue on their winning ways tonight against a Miami Heat team currently among a handful fighting for one of the last playoff slots, but are doing so without Dion Waiters (ankle) who has been instrumental in their surge after an 11-30 start to the season.
Beating the Heat (35-37) will require Boston to play better than they did against the Suns, a game Boston won, but in many ways had the feeling of defeat.
Yes, Devin Booker’s career-high 70 points was very much a blow – a huge blow – to the pride of a team that takes tremendous pride in its defense.
But the sense of a loss came in the form of purpose while playing as close to their potential as possible.
The Celtics fell short on both fronts Friday night.
Being just one game behind Cleveland (47-24) for the best record in the East, the Celtics understand getting as many wins as possible is the mindset right now.
But coach Brad Stevens knows that while winning is important, how the team plays is even more valuable.
“Like I’ve said before, I’m surprised at where we are record-wise because we’ve got to play at a higher level for 48 minutes,” Stevens said. “We just don’t do it.”
Is this Stevens’ way of trying to motivate his players after a not-so-great performance?
Or is he seriously concerned that his team isn’t as good as their record?
The Celtics, by their own standards, and to those of us on the outside looking in, know they are a better team than the one we saw on Friday night.
Not having Avery Bradley (sick) certainly hurt Boston’s efforts defensively.
Still, a Friday night’s game wore on, Booker’s confidence only grew and the Celtics’ desire to shut him down or at least slow him down, began to dissipate like an ice cube in hell.
And that’s a problem - a big problem - for a team that has to be connected at both ends of the floor for an extended period of time in order to play at the level their capable of and, most important, give them the best shot at emerging victorious in the postseason.
That’s why Stevens isn’t too caught up in the team’s chances of catching Cleveland, or whether they go into the playoffs riding a fat winning streak.
“I’m not going to get caught up in winning a couple of games in a row and all that stuff,” Stevens said. “I want to get caught up in playing well. We’ve shown ourselves capable of playing well, we have not sustained it throughout a game. And it’s been pretty consistent.”

Win vs. Islanders 'a nice building block' for Bruins


Win vs. Islanders 'a nice building block' for Bruins

BROOKLYN, NY – It wasn’t particularly entertaining and it won’t be all that memorable down the ride aside from the timing and importance of the meeting between the Bruins and Islanders. But it was a solid 2-1 team win for the Bruins over the Islanders at the Barclays Center on Saturday night with the B’s grinding all the way down to the end while protecting a one-goal lead through much of the third period.

Nearly everybody across Boston’s roster contributed in the major victory over the team trying to bypass them in the wild card standings, and it was a beautiful thing. Anton Khudobin stepped up when Tuukka Rask couldn’t start Saturday night’s showdown with a lower body issue, and Riley Nash supplied both Boston goals from a fourth line that’s played some of their best hockey lately.

It was unlikely heroes all around for the Black and Gold in the tightly-wound contest, but that diversity of talent and production can be a very good thing for a team looking to make that playoff push.

“You have to stay with it. You have to stay in the moment and stay with the game no matter what’s happening during the game. That’s how you get results, and that’s how you find ways to persevere through adversity,” said Patrice Bergeron. “We just got back to playing stingy, especially in the neutral zone. We got away from it the last few games, and it was nice tonight to be back playing a low-scoring game like what we’re used to playing.”

When it was all said and done the Bruins only allowed 19 shots on net and also killed off six penalties in the kind of grinding defensive showdown that you haven’t seen all that much out of the Black and Gold lately. It was exactly what Cassidy was looking for to snap the four-game losing streak, and once again start pushing the Bruins upward into the playoff chase.

“That’s the type of win that goes a long way in the room when your goaltender is battling hard and fighting that hard to see pucks and find pucks and your D are blocking shots. And you kill that many penalties. It was a nice building block for us,” said Cassidy. “From the goalie on out, everybody was in there [in the win]. It was a tough game. It was a nice Bruins win. We had been doing it with offense earlier, and we’ve got to be able to do it both ways. You need to be able to win 2-1 hockey games, and it had been awhile.”

Now it’s simply up to the Bruins to be feeling good about their latest win while going back to basics, and looking for more next time around after ending their worst losing streak of the season.