Rebuttal 2015: Making an issue of Colts' testing football

new-england-patriots-football-afc-championship-game.jpg

Rebuttal 2015: Making an issue of Colts' testing football

The Patriots made sure to point out in their rebuttal that, while they are the ones in the NFL’s crosshairs, the Indianapolis Colts were actually the ones acknowledging that they were doing things to the football they shouldn’t.

Wells’ report noted that, “During the second quarter of the AFC Championship Game, a ball thrown by Tom Brady was intercepted by a player for the Colts and the ball was taken to the Colts sideline. On the sideline, Colts equipment personnel used a pressure gauge to measure the inflation level of the ball, determined that it was below the minimum 12.5 psi level and informed a game official and other NFL personnel.”

The Patriots’ rebuttal points out this is a violation.

“Once the game starts, neither team is allowed to gauge the footballs, pump them, or the like,” they wrote. “That is solely the province of the referee, who is to be the “sole judge” of whether footballs comply. The Colts, with advance concerns about psi, did not take the issue to the referee. They took the matter into their own hands and had an intern gauge the football. (pg. 63) This conduct was in violation of Rule 2. Nowhere does the Report identify this conduct as a violation of the Rule.”

Later, the rebuttal states, “The intercepted football was separately tested three times — and each of the three measurements (apparently using a single gauge) showed a different psi number — 11.45, 11.35, and 11.75 (pg. 70). These significant differences demonstrate the extent to which gauges vary from each other (indeed, the Colts gauged this football at 11.00 psi — see pg. 63) and that even a single gauge used multiple times on the same football results in different readings. This imprecision is scarcely the basis on which precise conclusions can be based.”