Belichick acknowledges looming scheme changes


Belichick acknowledges looming scheme changes

By Tom E. Curran Patriots InsiderFollow @tomecurran
FOXBORO- Last week, Bill Belichick pished-poshedtheflurry of speculation about whether his team will run a 3-4 defense or a 4-3. He did that despite the fact he hired the most devastating 4-3 DT in the league, Albert Haynesworth (when he feels like it), has been running a ton of four-man fronts in practice and that recently released Ty Warren said it's clear the team is changing to a 4-3 set. Belichick's contention is that it really doesn't matter how many guys are in three-point stances at the front of the defense. What matters is their alignment and marching orders.OK. Point taken. But as the pass-rushing 4-3 defensive ends and defensive tackles with pocket-crashing ability stack up like cord wood here at Gillette Stadium, Belichick acknowledged on Monday that, yeah, things may look a little differently. This past weekend the Patriots added Andre Carter, a pass-rushing specialist at defensive end. Asked about Carter's strength Belichick said, "Last year with(when Carter was with Washington)they went to a 3-4 defense and it wasn't a good fit for him in that system.But we feel like with what we'll be asking him to do this year, as opposed to what he was asked to do last year and what we've seen him do in the first nine years of his career that we could use his ability on the edge and (we felt he could ) be effective."Ah-HA! So there you have it. Carter sucked in the 3-4, he's been hired to play here where his skills will be a better fit, 3-4. I am ... a super sleuth. Here's the thing though - and this is the point Belichick is trying to makeby being persnickety about the front- just because Carter has 4-3 defensive end attributes (the ability to get upfield, beat left tackles 1-on-1 and get to the quarterback), doesn't mean the Patriots are going away totally from their 3-4 roots. They will switch and mix and match. And sometimes Carter will be at the end in a 4-3. And other times, Shaun Ellis will be at the end in a 3-4. Down, distance, matchups, time left in the game, field position, injuries and personnel are going to figure in. Adding Carter, Ellis, Mark Anderson and Haynesworth allows them to be more versatile. That's all. "I don't think the defensive philosophy's gonna change," Belichick added. "How we align and how we handle the responsibilities could definitely change by game plan or by what we feel are our strengths and weaknesses, but I don't think fundamentally our philosophy and techniques will change. I think what we're teaching, we'll continue to teach and use on a very consistent basis. How we want to move guys around or put them in certain formations ...I think there's flexibility there."What this whole conversation comes down to is this: "Will the Patriots become an attacking defense? Will they remain a read and react defense?""We have an assortment of things to choose from from my time here and depending on how our teams shapes up, what some of these players can do (will help decide the scheme). Some of these players I'venever coached before so I'm not sure exactly how they'll fit in or what roles they'll play in this defense. We'll just have to wait and see how that turns out. I think we'll have enough defense where we'll be able to."It certainly seems that way. Tom E. Curran can be reached at Follow Tom on Twitter at http:twitter.comtomecurran

Mayock: Under-the-radar tight ends, defensive backs could interest Patriots


Mayock: Under-the-radar tight ends, defensive backs could interest Patriots

Until the tidal wave of free-agent moves comes crashing down in March, it's not exactly clear what anyone's needs are in this year's draft. But that won't keep us from guessing with the NFL Scouting Combine taking place this week in Indy.

From a Patriots perspective, they may need a tight end to provide some Rob Gronkowski insurance, especially if Martellus Bennett leaves town for the highest bidder. Defensively, they might be looking at big bodies up front or linebackers. They could also choose to dip into one of the deeper position groups in this year's class -- defensive back -- if they're taking a strict best-player-available approach. 

No matter which spots they're thinking about in this year's draft, the Patriots have a pretty well-defined set of likes and dislikes when it comes to prospect traits. That's what allows someone like NFL Network draft analyst Mike Mayock -- who held a marathon two-hour conference call with reporters from around the country on Monday -- to make an educated guess on the types of players Bill Belichick will be thinking about in late April. 

At tight end, Mayock thinks Alabama's OJ Howard is a perfect match for New England. He can catch. He can block. He's an athlete. He came up in Nick Saban's program. The only problem is there seems to be very little chance Howard is available at pick No. 32. 

The good news for the Patriots? It's such a deep tight end class, Mayock rattled off a handful of other names who could potentially find themselves in a huddle looking at Tom Brady in 2017. 

"As you drop down and look at the other tight ends after [Howard], there's some really good pass-catching tight ends that would be more like an [Aaron] Hernandez," Mayock said. "You start talking about David Njoku of Miami, he's an absolute freak, and he's also tough enough to learn how to block. Again, I don't know if he gets to the Patriots [at No. 32].

"Evan Engram and Gerald Everett are the two guys that are kind of the move wide receiver tight end. They can play in the slot. Jake Butt had an ACL at Michigan at the end of his season, but he's one of those in-line blockers. Tough guy. Good enough athletically to catch the ball short and intermediate.

"This is a great tight end class. You can get second and third-round tight ends that make a lot of sense. I think down the road a little bit, Michael Roberts from Toledo is a big guy that needs to block better, but he's got some pass catching skills. New England's going to have their choice of a bunch of different tight ends in this draft and get them in the first three rounds."

Defensive back is another area where the Patriots may be able to wait to find an impact player, Mayock suggested. One of the first names that popped into Mayock's mind when it comes to what intrigues Belichick was a safety who played his college ball in the area.

"I think a guy that would have to be interesting to New England is Obi Melifonwu from Connecticut," he said. "Six-foot-4, 219 [pounds], and he's probably going to run sub 4.5 [40-yard dash]. If he runs in that range, I think teams are going to start looking at him as a corner and a safety.

"The reason I think New England, with Matt Patricia, I think they're the best matchup group in the league. Look what they did with Eric Rowe from the Eagles, what they did with [Kyle] Van Noy -- two guys that were kind of cast-offs. They brought them there for matchup reasons. That's what they do. I look at Melifonwu, he looks like a guy that could cover a tight end one week and go out wide and cover a big wideout the next week. I think he'd be interesting.

"[Another] a really good football player that nobody talks about is Lorenzo Jerome of Saint Francis. And what he runs this week is going to be important. But I think he can play both safety positions, and he's really, really a good football player. Like him a lot . . .

"Other names: Des King, who is a corner from Iowa that I think is going to be a nickel or safety, and I think New England always has success moving those guys around a little bit . . . I like Des King; I like Kevin King from Washington who is a corner that can play some free safety; and I like Chidobe Awuzie from Colorado, who (is a corner that) I think might be better off as a safety."

Could Adrian Peterson be a fit with the Patriots?

Could Adrian Peterson be a fit with the Patriots?

Will Brinson of CBS Sports talks with Toucher and Rich about speculation that Vikings running back Adrian Peterson could be a fit with the Patriots this offseason, and if not New England, then who?