The defining stretch of the season

53089.jpg

The defining stretch of the season

By: Rich Levine
CSNNE.com

BOSTON It was the stretch that was supposed to define the Celtics regular season.

It was the closest Boston would come to playoff action until the real thing, and how they fared in their five games in 10 days against the Mavericks, Magic, (bobcats), Lakers and Heat was supposed to shape our perception of the final two months.

The results werent going to alter expectations, but the level of Celtics success would most certainly lingereither as the ultimate security blanket or a source of passive panicas the team played out the regular season.

Why?

Well, because at this point there are pretty much only seven teams with a shot (to varying degrees) of winning the 2011 title, and only against those other six teamsSan Antonio, Dallas, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago and Orlandocan Celtics fans gain a true measure of what to expect in April.

Boston would faced four of those tests over the aforementioned 10 day stretch. Over the 59 days that followed (aka the extent of the season), theyd face three.

In fact, it would be another six and a half weeks before the Celtics played another legitimate contender (March 31, at San Antonio), and by the time the Cs visited Chicago on April 7 and Miami on April 10, who knew where the standings would be? Who knew what would matter?

For all we knew, this was it.

After the Celtics were finished (in terms of the big picture and barring some freak injury to one of the Big Four) the rest of the season wasnt supposed to matter quite as much. For better or worse, we were going to learn all there was about this years team.

Or so we thought.

In the end, the Celtics 2-3 journey through the NBA gauntlet did very little to kill or encourage hopes for this season. When healthy, they lost to the Mavericks and beat the Magic. While short-handed, they lost to the Lakers and beat the Heat. They did this... but. They did that but. Basically, after all's said and done, no ones rushing to book hotel rooms in LA for June. But no ones jumping off the Zakim.

In the end, THE stretch was sort of anti-climactic.

But for all the back and forth there were some certainties to emerge from last 10 days in Celtics Nation.

Here are five:

1. Home court isnt everything

Doc and the team have stressed the importance of home court all season. Theyve even used it as an excuse for why they blew Game 7 in LA. But the Celtics went 2-2 at home over this stretchhome court isnt everything. Is it an advantage? Yes. But if its a matter of over-extending yourself in the regular season, then home court just isnt worth it. Home court guarantees nothing.

This is an issue because while we spent the last few months saying things like, The Celtics will be fine if they can just STAY healthy, after the last five games its now The Celtics will be fine if they can just GET healthy.

They are no longer healthy; not even close. And until they are, the importance of seeding and standings and home court advantage is minimal. The half game lead on the Heat is nice, but killing yourself to keep pace with them is crazier than DeMarcus Cousins.

2. They need to find a small forward.

You never imagined the Celtics would be players at the deadline, and finding another small forward is much easier said than done, but Danny needs to make it happen. He needs to make some sort of move.

First of all, do you really believe Marquis Daniels will be back in time for the Playoffs? And if so, do you really think that hell be ready to just jump right back into playoff basketball?

This isnt a knock on Daniels. Its just the reality. Hes human. And its hard to predict how anyone would bounce back from something like that. Last year, the guy missed extended time with a thumb injury and never regained his rhythm or focus. This year, its an injury thats infinitely more serious. Im not saying that hell definitely be a non-factor, but are you comfortable just rolling the dice that he will be? Gun to your head: Do you think hell even be back at all?

This is a serious injury. Its related to another serious injury that he suffered last year. This isnt something that doctors are going to mess around with. Its not, OK, just go out and test that ankle and see what you can do. Its beyond that. Its beyond basketball.

And now, on top of that, youve got Paul Pierce, whos clearly struggling with an assortment of injuries; whos going in for an MRI on his left foot on Monday; who also recently sprained his hand; who needs to rest for the playoffs.

Maybe Von Wafer can fill in for the time beingand honestly, all things considered, he's been great. But when the Celtics are playing on the road in the post-season (and assuming Daniels wont be there) Von Wafer might now be enough. There needs to be someone else.

Obviously, there are about 15,000 hurdles standing between my words and reality.

Its not easy. But, just thinking out loud, why not see if you can find someone to take Nate Robinson. Youd like to keep him around for that potential spark off the bench, but if Delontes healthy, do you really NEED him? Is he more important than filling that huge void left by Marquis? Maybe Nate himself doesnt get you that guy, but if the Celtics have a plan in place, if they get wind of a potential buy out, or can find a legitimate swing man to target, then getting rid of Nate gives them some freedom.

People throw out names like Rip Hamilton and James Posey and it's often just laughed off as far fetched rumors and speculation. But the Celtics ability to stand pat went down with Marquis Daniels. Danny Ainge has had to get creative in the past and he needs to again. The Celtics needs reinforcements. Or at least one.

3. Glen Davis wont be getting a last minute invite to the Dunk Contest

Good Lord.

4. Kendrick Perkins CAN be counted on

For the first half of this season, there was one big question hanging over Kendrick Perkins rehab. Even if he comes back, will he be the same Perk? Will he need that extra time (that usually required readjustment period) to regain his confidence and comfort level on the court? Could this end up as a lost season?

Well, so far, its pretty much been the best-case scenario.

You already forget what it was like when Perk was gone. Hes slipped right back into his role, and while theres still room for improvementespecially in terms of conditioninghe can be counted on. He will make a difference down the stretch. And if by some chance, Shaq and Jermaine can follow suit, its scary to think about the kind of damage this front line can do in the postseason.

5. Rajon Rondo can take the team to new heights (except against LA)
He was fantastic against the Heat. Rondo willed us the game, said Doc Rivers. And he was right. Rondo threw the team on the back even if they werent entirely interested in a ride. Whether it was the triple-double, his defense on LeBron or that will Rondo was the difference. Same goes for last Sunday against Orlando, where he dominated in a different way, scoring a season-high 26 points, setting a season-high in free throws made and attempted. On that afternoon, for the first time in a long time, Rondo put the incessant over-passing on the backburner and just attacked. And the Celtics were better for it.

In a perfect world, the Celtics would get that every night, but its just not like that. Part of the reason is the beating he takes in the process. People joked about all the time Rondo spent on his backside during that Orlando game, but thats what happens when he attacks.

And if he did that every game, he wouldnt last.

Do you remember how worn down he was by the end of last season? The back and leg issues that plagued him against the Lakers? Thats what happens when Rondo gets too beat up. He knows he needs to save it for the post season. But against the Magic (and in spurts against the Heat), he showed us that when he wants to, he can still takeover. Rondos best two games of this stretch were Orlando and Miami, and not coincidentally, those were the two Boston won.

But as you saw (and I wrote), he still hasnt shown he can do it against the Lakers. He still hasnt found away to beat that defense. And ultimately, beating them might be the only thing that matters.

And with that, so ends the supposedly defining stretch of the Celtics regular season.

Could have been better. Could have been worse. We hoped that it would have provided more clarity, and put the C's on the fast track to April, but maybe that was asking too much. After all, there's still a lot of basketball to be played.

Even if the competition won't touch the last 10 days.

Rich Levine's column runs each Monday, Wednesday and Friday on CSNNE.com. Rich can be reached at rlevine@comcastsportsnet.com. Follow Rich on Twitter at http:twitter.comrlevine33

MLB may make rule changes for '18 season

MLB may make rule changes for '18 season

PHOENIX - Major League Baseball intends to push forward with the process that could lead to possible rule changes involving the strike zone, installation of pitch clocks and limits on trips to the pitcher's mound. While baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred expressed hope the ongoing process would lead to an agreement, he said clubs would reserve the right to act unilaterally, consistent with the rule-change provision of the sport's labor contract.

Union head Tony Clark said last weekend he did not foresee players agreeing to proposed changes for 2017. Under baseball's collective bargaining agreement, management can alter playing rules only with agreement from the union - unless it gives one year notice. With the one year of notice, management can make changes on its own.

"Unfortunately it now appears that there really won't be any meaningful change for the 2017 season due to a lack of cooperation from the MLBPA," Manfred said Tuesday during a news conference. "I've tried to be clear that our game is fundamentally sound, that it does not need to be fixed as some people have suggested, and I think last season was the kind of demonstration of the potential of our league to captivate the nation and of the game's unique place in American culture."

Yet, he also added: "I believe it's a mistake to stick our head in the sand and ignore the fact that our game has changed and continues to change."

Manfred said while he prefers an agreement, "I'm also not willing to walk away." He said he will send a letter to the union in the coming days and plans to continue dialogue with Clark and others in hopes of reaching agreement.

Clark met with Cactus League teams last week, five at a time over Thursday, Friday and Saturday, before departing Monday for Florida to visit each Grapefruit League club - and proposed rules changes were a topic.

"I have great respect for the labor relations process, and I have a pretty good track record for getting things done with the MLBPA," Manfred said. "I have to admit, however, that I am disappointed that we could not even get the MLBPA to agree to modest rule changes like limits on trips to the mound that have little effect on the competitive character of the game."

Clark saw talks differently.

"Unless your definition of `cooperation' is blanket approval, I don't agree that we've failed to cooperate with the commissioner's office on these issues," he wrote in an email to The Associated Press. "Two years ago we negotiated pace of play protocols that had an immediate and positive impact. Last year we took a step backward in some ways, and this offseason we've been in regular contact with MLB and with our members to get a better handle on why that happened. I would be surprised if those discussions with MLB don't continue, notwithstanding today's comments about implementation. As I've said, fundamental changes to the game are going to be an uphill battle, but the lines of communication should remain open."

Clark added "my understanding is that MLB wants to continue with the replay changes (2-minute limit) and the no-pitch intentional walks and the pace of game warning/fine adjustments."

Manfred said he didn't want to share specifics of his priorities for alterations.

"There's a variety of changes that can be undertaken," Manfred said. "I'm committed to the idea that we have a set of proposals out there and we continue to discuss those proposals in private."

MLB has studied whether to restore the lower edge of the strike zone from just beneath the kneecap to its pre-1996 level - at the top of the kneecap. Management would like to install 20-second pitch clocks in an attempt to speed the pace of play - they have been used at Triple-A and Double-A for the past two seasons.

Players also have been against limiting mound meetings. The least controversial change appears to be allowing a team to call for an intentional walk without the pitcher having to throw pitches. In addition, MLB likely can alter some video review rules without the union's agreement- such as shortening the time a manager has to call for a review.

"Most of this stuff that they were talking about I don't think it would have been a major adjustment for us," Royals manager Ned Yost said.

Manfred said starting runners on second base in extra innings sounds unlikely to be implemented in the majors. The change will be experimented with during the World Baseball Classic and perhaps at some short-season Class A leagues. Manfred said it was a special-purpose rule "beneficial in developmental leagues."

Manfred also said Tuesday that a renovated Wrigley Field would be a great choice to host an All-Star Game and Las Vegas could be a "viable market for us."

"I don't think that the presence of legalized gambling in Las Vegas should necessarily disqualify that market as a potential major league city," Manfred said.

Bulpett: Ainge 'really protective' of ability to go to free agency this summer

Bulpett: Ainge 'really protective' of ability to go to free agency this summer

Steve Bulpett joins Mike Felger to weigh in on the NBA trade deadline and the lack of moves made by Danny Ainge and the Boston Celtics thus far.