No suspension for Garnett following Phoenix incident


No suspension for Garnett following Phoenix incident

By A. Sherrod Blakely

LOS ANGELES It's bad enough the Boston Celtics have played so many games with players out because of injuries.

The last thing they need is to add a suspended player to list of reasons for being short-handed.

Boston won't have to worry about that, at least not for Sunday's game against the Los Angeles Lakers.

The Celtics will have their emotional catalyst, Kevin Garnett, available following his ejection in the fourth quarter of Friday's 88-71 loss at Phoenix.

There was some concern that he might be suspended for Sunday's game due to the incident between him and Channing Frye that led to him picking up two technical fouls which is an automatic ejection.

Tim Frank, the NBA's senior vice president of basketball communications, said late Saturday night that the only technical fouls that were still under review by the league involved Celtics head coach Doc Rivers who was ejected in the second quarter of the loss.

With 4:07 to play in the game, Frye was fouled by Garnett while attempting a 3-pointer.

Following the release of the shot, Garnett struck Frye in his groin region.

Frye soon fell to the floor, but rose to his feet just as quickly.

The two got in each other's faces before players and the game officials intervened.

Play was stopped while the officials converged at the scorer's table to view the replay.

After the review, lead official Steve Javie - he had already tossed out Rivers in the second quarter - called Garnett for two technicals, while Frye, Boston's Kendrick Perkins and Nate Robinson, were each charged with one technical foul for their roles in the incident.

"I just didn't think it was an appropriate play to make," Frye told reporters after the game. "I don't want to make a bigger deal than it is. The league will take care of that."

Following the loss, Rivers didn't believe the punishment handed out to Garnett was right.

"I thought Channing Frye was the instigator," Rivers said. "Kevin didn't jump in Channing's face. I thought Channing Frye jumped in Kevin's face. I don't know how we get a throw-out on that."

A. Sherrod Blakely can be reached at Follow Sherrod on Twitter at http:twitter.comsherrodbcsn.

Blakely: Thomas isn't a starter, but new All-Star voting is an improvement

Blakely: Thomas isn't a starter, but new All-Star voting is an improvement

BOSTON – There’s certainly some disappointment among Celtics Nation that Isaiah Thomas just missed out on being an All-Star starter in the East.

But one thing we can certainly see with the new voting system … it works way better than the old way of choosing starters.

This was the first year that the NBA decided to allow current NBA players as well as a select panel of media choose who the starting five in the Eastern and Western Conferences would be.

The fan vote would count for 50 percent while media and players would each represent 25 percent of the final tally.

From there, the players would receive a fan ranking, a media ranking and a player ranking.

Because of the aforementioned breakdown – fans count for 50 percent while media and players represent 25 percent of the vote – the fan ranking would be counted twice while the media and player rankings would be counted once.

Let’s look at Isaiah Thomas’ situation which ultimately came down to him and Toronto’s DeMar DeRozan for the final starting spot in the backcourt.

Thomas was fourth in the fan voting, second in the player voting and first among guards in the media voting. So when you add the fan voting (4 *2) + player voting (2 *1) + media voting (1*1), you get a total of 11 which is then divided by 4 to arrive at a score of 2.75.

Now let’s look at DeRozan.

He was third in the fan voting, third in the player ranking and second in the media voting among guards. So his score when you add the fan voting (3*2) + player voting (3*1) + media voting (2*1), you get a total of 11 which when divided by 4 brings you to a score of 2.75 – same as Thomas.

The tiebreaker was the fan vote which meant DeRozan and not Thomas, would get the starting nod in next month’s All-Star game.

As much as it may suck that Thomas lost out because of this system, he would not have had a shot at being a starter under the old system in which the fans were the ones to pick starters.

In fact, it would have been Chicago’s Dwyane Wade in the starting lineup under the old system.

No disrespect to D-Wade, but he has not had an All-Star worthy season. And had the old system been in place, he would be an all-star and thus take up a roster spot of another player who frankly, is more deserving.

And if you take a glance out West, they too would have had a starter who has not had an All-Star caliber season.

Golden State’s Zaza Pachulia finished second in the voting among Western Conference forwards, fueled in large part to his home country, Georgia, voting early and often for him. Because of the media and player voting, Pachulia wound up sixth among Western Conference big men which is still too high when you consider some of the players behind him – Memphis’ Marc Gasol, Minnesota’s Karl-Anthony Towns, San Antonio’s LaMarcus Aldridge and Los Angeles Clippers’ DeAndre Jordan – who are all having better seasons.

While no one would say this new system is perfect, considering how this year’s voting would have panned out under the old rules, this change by the league is a good one that should stick around.

NOTE: I was among the media panelists selected by the NBA to vote for this year’s All-Star starters. My selections in the East were Cleveland’s LeBron James, Kevin Love and Milwaukee’s Giannis Antetokounmpo in the frontcourt with Cleveland’s Kyrie Irving and Boston’s Isaiah Thomas in the backcourt. My Western Conference selections were Kevin Durant of Golden State, Anthony Davis of New Orleans and Kawhi Leonard of San Antonio in the frontcourt, with Houston’s James Harden and Oklahoma City’s Russell Westbrook in the backcourt.