Celtics-Grizzlies review: Boston loses by double digits

974721.jpg

Celtics-Grizzlies review: Boston loses by double digits

BOSTON True to form, the Boston Celtics maintained their lopsided-playing ways with a 93-83 loss to Memphis. 
It was Boston's 12th double-digit loss this season out of 17 defeats, reinforcing Doc Rivers' greatest fears about his team.
When they lose, they don't just lose: they get blown out. 
"It's amazing, the difference for us when we win and lose games," Rivers said recently. "The numbers are startling. That's what we have to improve."
In their 14 wins, the C's have won by an average of  9.1 points per game. In the 16 losses prior to Wednesday's game, Boston was getting beat by an average of 12.2 points per game. 
Here are some of the keys identified prior to tonight's game that in some fashion played a role in the C's suffering yet another decisive defeat. 

WHAT TO LOOK FOR: Memphis has one of the best 1-2 frontcourt punches with Zach Randolph and Marc Gasol. Their ability to control the action inside the paint is at the heart of why Memphis ranks among the NBA leaders in points in the paint (43.7, 7th) and rebounds (52.5, 8th) per game.
WHAT WE SAW: The Randolph-Gasol tandem was far from spectacular for the Grizzlies. The duo combined for 11 points on 4-for-15 shooting to go with 15 rebounds.

MATCHUP TO WATCH:  Kevin Garnett vs Zach Randolph: Although Garnett's production as dipped since moving to power forward, the C's remain convinced that this will benefit him and the Celtics over the long haul. Randolph remains one of the more under-rated talents in the NBA, averaging 17 points and 12.5 rebounds per game this season. 
WHAT WE SAW:  Garnett did a better-than-average job defensively on Randolph, but it clearly had an impact on his scoring as Garnett had 12 points on 5-for-14 shooting along with seven rebounds. Randolph had six points on 3-for-8 shooting to go with eight rebounds. 
"I have to balance it out between being more offensively minded and being defensively minded," Garnett said. "I'm playing against one of the best forwards in the world, and that being Zach. I have a lot of respect for him. I knew it was going to be a bear fight; just getting ready for that matchup. I never once really balanced it out as far as being offensive minded so I have to do a better job with that."

PLAYER TO WATCH: Easily it will be Avery Bradley. His long-awaited return should provide a boost of energy -- or at the very least, better play defensively -- that the Celtics are in desperate need right now. 
WHAT WE SAW: His defense was decent, but not exceptional by anyone's standards. He made a couple of baskets on cuts to the basket, which was what got him going offensively last season. He's definitely a work in progress, but certainly showed signs of eventually working his way into delivering the kind of high impact play both he and the Celtics expect from him defensively. He finished with four points in 19 minutes. 
"He's a big addition to what we do," Garnett said. Said Paul Pierce, "It's good to really see him out there tonight."

STAT TO TRACK: Scoring will indeed be at a premium for the Celtics against a stingy Grizzlies defense that's giving up an NBA-low 90 points per game. Boston has failed to score 90 or more points in two of their last three games. 
WHAT WE SAW: Boston was getting its share of points, but there was one problem. Their defense was giving up even more. After shooting better than 60 percent in the first half and better than 50 percent most of the second, Memphis was having one of its better games offensively as they fended off a late Celtics surge to get the win. 
"Percentage-wise we played good defense in the second half," said C's coach Doc Rivers. "We just couldn't score."

BOSTON SPORTS TONIGHT PODCAST: Is trading for Paul George worth the risk?

george_bst_062317.jpg

BOSTON SPORTS TONIGHT PODCAST: Is trading for Paul George worth the risk?

SUBSCRIBE iTunes | Stitcher | RSS

0:41 - Michael Holley, Kayce Smith and Tom Giles recap their thoughts on drafting Jayson Tatum and trade rumors involving the Celtics.

6:21 - Ian Thomsen joins BST to discuss if it would be worth trading for Paul George as a one-year rental and if there would be a chance he could still around long-term if traded to Boston.

11:13 - Evan Drellich joins BST to talk about Rick Porcello’s outing, the Red Sox offense coming to life, and Doug Fister being claimed by the Red Sox. 

15:10 - Kyle Draper and A. Sherrod Blakely look back at the Celtics/Nets trade, what the assets have turned into, and if Danny Ainge has done a good job turning those assets into players. 

Haggerty: Bruins playing it pretty safe at the NHL Draft

Haggerty: Bruins playing it pretty safe at the NHL Draft

CHICAGO – As opening nights go at the NHL Draft, Friday night was a bit of a ho-hum affair for the Boston Bruins at the United Center home of the Chicago Blackhawks.

The Bruins went the safe route by drafting a smooth, defensive-minded defenseman with the 18th overall pick when they selected Finnish product Urho Vaakenainen, and in doing so left more dynamic forwards like Kristian Vesalainen and Kailer Yamamoto still on the draft board for other teams to claim as their own. It was a bit of a curious choice given how many defensemen the Bruins already have in the prospect pipeline, but the lack of strength in the draft class seemed to lead teams to carve their own paths looking for players.

MORE: Bruins select defenseman Urho Vaakanainen with No. 18 pick

The 6-foot-1, 188-pounder clearly has miles to go offensively despite his smooth skating and solid passing skills, but there’s also a consideration that the teenager has been playing in the men’s league in Finland for the last couple of seasons. It makes things a little more difficult to project for the Finn D-man, but the Bruins believe there is some upside to his offensive game given the skills, the hockey IQ and the considerable confidence that the player has in his own game.

“His gap control and skating ability are really good. He’s obviously played in the Finnish Elite League at a very young age for one and a half years now and he’s played on the big stage at the world juniors. We feel like there’s a lot of upside for a 200-foot player that gets back on pucks, and then can transition them back out. Being able to cover ice is an important part of the game, and it continues to evolve in that direction,” said Bruins GM Don Sweeney, who indicated Vaakenainen will play in North America in 2018-19 after fulfilling his contractual obligations in Finland. “We tracked what he did on offense at the junior league level prior to him jumping to the elite league, and it lines up pretty well with other elite players that made the jump to that level.

“It’s a valid question and whether he gets put into those [offensive] situations this year is what we’re excited about with his [Finnish] team moving forward.”

While Vaakenainen sounded surprised the Bruins selected him after only a single meeting at the NHL scouting combine, Sweeney said that Boston’s head scout in Finland has enough history with the family to vouch for the kid’s makeup.

So while it’s far from a sexy pick and the Bruins could have tried to hit a home run with an 18th overall selection in a mediocre draft, the B’s will also get some time before anybody is ready to label the Finnish blueliner a boom or a bust.

The rest of the draft night didn’t add up to much for the B’s, however. They made the selection of Vaakenainen after strongly considering dropping down in the first round, and in doing so lost one of the better trade chips in the form of their 2017 first round pick. There were discussions with Minnesota about Marco Scandella and a few trade feelers to other clubs that might listen on a D-man, but the Bruins now have to hit the reset button on trade discussions for left-shot defensemen or top-6 left wings.

Perhaps Scandella’s $4 million per season salary was an issue for the Bruins, or maybe the Bruins didn’t want to give up their first round pick for a 27-year-old D-man coming off a so-so season with the Wild. Either way, there wasn’t enough momentum for the Bruins to get a trade done with a bevy of defensemen rumored to be available if the offer is good enough.

“I was on the record saying that we’d be offering our first round pick for target-specific players, and we did do that,” said Sweeney. “I don’t blame teams for not necessarily wanting to go through with it, so we went ahead with a player we wanted with our own pick. We continue to build what we think is a good group of guys moving forward.

“There are a couple of areas we’d like to address and get better. We’re trying to help our team currently. Certainly Brandon [Carlo] jumped into our lineup and we hope Charlie [McAvoy] will carry over what he did, and we have other players that will push. We have six returning defensemen we feel good about and we’ll certainly push from underneath, but it’s an area we’ll continue to address. We have some forwards that we also hope will come online, but we’ll never stop exploring and trying to improve our club.”

So let’s sum it all up after a week of additions and subtractions from the Original Six organization: The Bruins added a decidedly vanilla defenseman in the first round of the NHL Draft that might be a simple stay-at-home guy, and they weren’t able to muster any kind of deals for a D-man or winger to enhance the NHL roster. On the other hand, they didn’t give up much over the week as well and they didn’t do much at all to harm a solid roster that looked like they were finally on the right track pushing into the playoffs last season.

The Bruins could be in store for an action-packed Day Two of the draft on Saturday full of promising prospects and bountiful trades, but it sure feels like the 2017 NHL Draft in Chicago isn’t going to be a very memorable one for the Black and Gold.