Claude has me seeing Green

197881.jpg

Claude has me seeing Green

By Michael Felger

A couple of thoughts for you on a Monday morning one Bruins, one Celtics.

I already like Tampas coach better than ours. While Juliens roll-four-lines approach had the Versus crew asking each other questions late in the game, Guy Boucher once again employed a lineup that didnt even HAVE a true fourth line. He dressed seven defensemen and only 11 forwards, mixing and matching the final two forwards (Nate Thompson and Adam Hall) with players from the top three lines. This is the norm for Boucher, not the exception.

Meanwhile, Julien had his fourth line of Greg Campbell, Shawn Thornton and Daniel Paille on the ice for an extended shift midway through the third period in Game 1.

With the Bruins down two goals.

With their first trip to the Stanley Cup Finals in two decades on the line.

Even the announcers took note, with Ed Olczyk asking sideline reporter Pierre McGuire, at what point do you start shortening your bench? McGuires answer was pretty simple. "Now," he said. Clearly, it was something they hadnt been used to seeing a coach rolling out his crashenergy line with this team in desperate need for goals late in a Stanley Cup playoff game. But thats Claude.

I mean, really. Is there another coach in the league who wouldnt have put Tyler Seguin back on the ice soon after the rookie did what he did to Tampa defenseman Mike Lundin in the first period? Seguin certainly has his problems defensively and along the wall and those problems were on display early in the first period but he had just torn the roof off the building and had turned a 3-0 runaway back into a game. Dont you think most coaches would have had Seguin back out there soon enough, seeing if a young, talented kid with fresh legs could create more pressure on the opponent?

Not Claude. Seguin didnt play the rest of the first period and was on the pine for the first 10 minutes of the next stanza. Nearly 15 minutes came off the clock before until he first saw the ice after the goal. He played only two shifts in the second period. He didnt see a second of time on the power play, which was once again atrocious (0-for-4).

Honestly, I wonder why they even dressed the kid. It makes perfect sense to sit him down if its a tight, one-goal game and the Bruins have to lock down in their own end. Fine. Dont play him. But he doesnt even get a sniff on the power play down two goals and no one clicking offensively? He doesnt get thrown back over the boards soon after the goal to see if he can build momentum? Maddening.

You also have to wonder if Boucher is in Juliens head a little bit, with the latter chafing every time someone mentions Tampas vaunted 1-3-1 neutral-zone trap. Of course, Boucher switched it up early in Game 1, going with a more aggressive forecheck and employing 2-2-1 looks. Regardless of what Julien says, the Bs clearly werent ready for it.

Just imagine. A coach who changes systems and alters his lineup on the fly. What a concept.

All that said, I think the Bruins should win this series. Note, I didnt say "will." I have no idea who will win this thing. It could go either way. But I didnt see the Lightnings advantage in top-end talent show itself on Saturday. I didnt look at that team and say, "Theyre just better." Not even close. If Tim Thomas can sharpen up and the defensemen can stop puking on their skates, the Bs will be just fine.

Then I can go back to ignoring the things that bug me about Julien.

I love how the Green Teamers are now rationalizing the Kendrick Perkins trade. Many of them will grudgingly allow that the trade may not have worked out (really?), but it still didnt have an impact on the Heat series. This is, of course, laughable.

The Perk trade had an impact on everything. Rondo got worse. Garnett wore down. Jeff Green didnt help Pierce. The Cs, who were holding the No. 1 seed in the East at the deadline, won only 15 of their remaining 27 games and lost home court to Chicago and Miami. And that didnt impact the Heat series how?

I wonder how perceptions change if the Bulls wipe out the Heat in the Conference Finals. Im not talking among the Green Teamers. Theyre hopeless, just awaiting instructions from above. Im talking about the rest of us. Normal people. Miami sure looked rough last night. The minions said the Celts lost because it was just the Heats time, that they had the two best players on the floor and thats what wins in the NBA. Really? I thought the best "team" won. At least that what they all told me when the Celts won three years ago. What if the Bulls, who dont own the two best players in the series, either, take down LeBron and Wade? Then what? Meanwhile, Perkins is getting ready for the Western Conference finals. Whoops.

Above and beyond all that, the simple fact is that the Celtics never looked like a championship caliber team the entire remainder of the season following the deadline when everyone considered them in that class before it. In the final two months they lost to seven different playoff teams -- Denver, Philadelphia, Memphis, Indiana, Atlanta, Chicago and Miami. Take out a five-game winning streak against five opponents who missed the playoffs, and the Cs werent even a .500 team following the deal.

I dont know how anyone could separate out the Heat series from the rest. Its ridiculous. The Cs werent the same team after the trade. Period. The players didnt buy in, and the team regressed badly. They werent good against anyone, including the Heat. Face it. Danny blew this one.

E-mail Felger HERE and read the mailbag on Thursday. Listen to him on the radio weekdays, 2-6 p.m. on 98.5 the Sports Hub.

Are they on a crash course?

rebuilding_the_bruins_-_starting_at_the_top.png

Are they on a crash course?

This is the first in a five-part “Rebuilding the Bruins” series about the breakdowns that doomed the team this season, and what must change for the Black and Gold to once again get moving in the right direction.

In many ways, this offseason is shaping up as a typical one for the Boston Bruins. There'll be roster fixes -- like last year's Milan Lucic and Dougie Hamilton trades on NHL draft weekend -- that they hope will result in upgrades and improvements. They'll work with their prospects and draft picks, looking for maturation and development . Hopefully, they'll work toward building a greater level of accountability and urgency among the core players, most of whom are expected to return.

And it some ways it's atypical. The heat is most definitely on president Cam Neely and general manager Don Sweeney after a second consecutive late-season collapse left the Bruins -- again -- one point shy of the postseason. Ownership clearly expects better, and has made its "expectations" clear.

The question is: Are Neely and Sweeney doing what needs to be done to get the franchise back on track?

“If people were to ask ‘Who is head of hockey operations?’, it’s a collaborative effort between a number of people,” said Bruins CEO Charlie Jacobs. “But if you ask for one sort of name, I would say it’s Cam Neely. I’m fairly certain my father" -- team owner Jeremy Jacobs -- "would share that sentiment.

"I just want to clarify. . . about investing in our team. It’s something that we continually do. We had leveraged our future (in recent years in an attempt to win immediately) to the point where something had to change last summer. We made the change and we’re righting the ledger, if you will, by stocking our team back up with prospects with the ability for cap flexibility to make the proper moves moving forward.

“We will always invest in this team. I think now we’re back on the right side of the ledger. We have an opportunity in front of us to move forward. We are a cap team and there should be expectations in an Original Six market that we continue to be a playoff contender and, frankly, a Stanley Cup contender. Given the mix of talent that we currently have on the roster and the youth that’s coming in, Cam’s aware of those expectations, as is Don.”

Those expectations underscore how much work there is to be done for a middling hockey club with some valuable individual pieces -- Patrice Bergeron, Brad Marchand, Tuukka Rask, David Krejci, David Pastrnak -- but far too many weaknesses that can be easily exploited by the better teams around the NHL.

The reality is, the Bruins are stuck in the mediocre middle right now . . . and that's a bad place to be. They're picking at No. 14 again, where the truly game-changing type of young player that Boston needs isn't available. In addition, the Bruins won’t be a true Stanley Cup contender again until they have a No. 1 defenseman in the 25-to-33-years-old range capable of playing 30 quality minutes per night over a long, two-month postseason run. They could also use a big, strong right winger with top-6 offensive potential. And they need to come up with an adequate backup goalie for Tuukka Rask.

That's a lot of work for Sweeney in one offseason.

“We just need to continue to get better, you know?” said Sweeney. “This is a performance-driven business and we’re going to be held to that standard and you know we fell short. We do believe that we should have [been in the playoffs]. That's not disparaging against the eight teams that [started the playoffs in the East] . . . [those] that are there they deserve it, and we fell just short of that. I still believe that we had a strong enough group to get in and challenge there. Then you just wait and see what happens.

"But we fell short in that and I take ownership of it. It’s on me; it’s not on anybody else to continue to improve our roster. That’s on me.”

Many around the league use terms like “half-pregnant” when describing the Bruins. Last season the B's had one foot pointed toward a rebuild and the other foot pointed toward competing for a playoff spot. In the end, they accomplished neither. Clearly, they were good enough to be in the playoffs -- the seventh-best goal differential in the East, a top-five offense and well above-average special teams’ play was enough to offset their shaky defense -- but Sweeney has to realize that even they'd made it they were destined to go out in the first round . . .which was the fate of the Red Wings and Flyers, the teams they were battling for one of the final two postseason spots in the East.

And that raises a deeper question: Is this current plan of action in the best long-term interest of the Bruins?

The front office's failings at the trade deadline are a prime example. Rather than face reality -- that even if they'd made the playoffs, they weren't going beyond one round -- the Bruins instead:

a) Shipped out future draft picks for marginal veteran upgrades in Lee Stempniak and John-Michael Liles.

b) Held onto unrestricted-free-agent-to-be Loui Eriksson, who was having his best season in a Boston uniform and might have fetched valuable long-term assets in a trade. That option no longer exists with Eriksson now on his way out the door.

Neely and Sweeney might argue that it’s pure media-driven hindsight to criticize those trade-deadline moves, which now look especially bad since the team failed to qualify for the postseason, but it's their jobs to shape the team’s future. It should have been very clear to both that the Bruins didn’t have the right stuff to make any kind of a playoff run. Playing and developing their promising young players down the stretch should have been the priority, but, frankly, that never felt like the case after Sweeney's band-aid trades for veteran rentals.

This was never more evident than when the Bruins flew Frank Vatrano cross-country on emergency recall at the start of the season-changing California road trip in late March, sat him for the loss to the San Jose Sharks, and then flew him back to Providence without having played a game. The emergency recall made little sense, especially considering how they could have used Vatrano’s scoring touch.

That simple fact was hammered home when the Bruins did come to their senses shortly afterward and recalled Vatrano, along with fellow prospect Colin Miller, for the final few pivotal games of the season. Both of those talented players should have been gaining that playoff-stretch experience in Boston all along. And who knows? They might have even provided the one extra point that ultimately cost them the playoff spot they so coveted.

Cultivating the next generation of Bruins talent is what will once again get them closer to their stated goal of Stanely Cup contention. (They’ll also need to get lucky with a top-pairing defenseman, or two, dropping into their lap along the way, of course.) But they'll be doomed to repeat the uninspired work of the last two seasons if they keep sailing the same course.

The Bruins need clarity in direction at the top of the organizational food chain. They need to do the right thing, rather than the easy thing.

The question is whether the Bruins want a nice, little playoff team or a legitimate Stanley Cup contender, and whether they have the temerity and the discipline to make certain it’s the latter rather than the former. Bruins management needs to start making hard, unpopular choices if it doesn't want the listless history of the last two years to continue repeating itself.

 

May 2, 2016: Martin Jones standing tall in Sharks net

cp-morning-skate.jpg

May 2, 2016: Martin Jones standing tall in Sharks net

Here are all the links from around the hockey world, and what I’m reading while giving everybody a 24-hour reprieve from any Game of Thrones spoilers.

 

*Good to see FOH (Friend of Haggs) Nick Cotsonika back with a byline covering the NHL: here he writes about Lightning goaltender Ben Bishop with some thoughts from Martin Brodeur.

 

*David Backes got the ultimate birthday present when he snapped home a game-winning overtime goal for the Blues.

 

*Boston boy Rick DiPietro is working without a net as an analyst for the New York Islanders now that his goaltending career has come to a close.

 

*Jaromir Jagr was named a finalist for the Masterton Trophy for his decades’ long dedication to the game of hockey.

 

*Brooks Orpik is suspended three games for his head shot on Olli Maatta, and it’s a bit ironic it happens against the Pittsburgh Penguins team he spent plenty of years throwing predator hits for prior to joining Washington.

 

*Damien Cox has a mock NHL Draft now that the top 14 lottery picks have been set in stone following last weekend.

 

*Martin Jones is standing tall for the San Jose Sharks, and proving to be a difference-maker in his first season for them between the pipes.

 

*For something completely different: as the father of a newborn baby girl, I read about this Zika virus and find it absolutely terrifying and tragic.

May 1, 2016: With NHL draft order set, time to deal?

cp-morning-skate.jpg

May 1, 2016: With NHL draft order set, time to deal?

Here are the links from around the hockey world, and what I’m reading after thinking Barack Obama gave Jeffrey Ross a run for his money as the Roast-master In Chief at last night’s White House Correspondent’s Dinner.

*The man behind the music at American Airlines Arena for the Dallas Stars’ games comes into the spotlight for a story.

 

*Don Cherry sings the praises of Joel Ward, wears a Toronto Marlies suit and said “it was time to go” for Bruce Boudreau in Anaheim.

 

*PHT writer Cam Tucker has Penguins coach Mike Sullivan taking major issue with the head shot Brooks Orpik laid on Olli Maatta.

 

*The Maple Leafs secure the No. 1 overall pick in last night’s NHL Draft lottery, which will no doubt lead them to Auston Matthews.

 

*Now that the Edmonton Oilers have the No. 4 pick, Peter Chiarelli is open to trade options for those teams wanting to move up.

 

*Ottawa Senators owner Eugene Melnyk is once again thriving in Ontario just a year after a major health scare.

 

*Good piece by FOH (Friend of Haggs) Kevin Kurz on the unique journey for Brent Burns that culminated in his Norris Trophy finalist honor this week.

 

*Spector has the roundup of rumors including plenty of speculation on Kevin Shattenkirk once the Blues are done in the playoffs.

 

*For something completely different: a couple of reporters actually got into an actual fight at the White House Correspondent’s after-party. It sounds like they both kind of deserved a punch in the face, to be honest.