Was the media fair to Bobby V?

879521.jpg

Was the media fair to Bobby V?

As baseball season winds down in Boston and does so far too early for the third consecutive year theres a calm thats settled over Fenway Park, the team that plays there, the fans (both real and imaginary) that pack the stands and the media that orchestrates the annual frenzy.

Its as if we all spent the last calendar year withstanding a relentless storm; having our lives turned upside down and being driven to the brink of insanity by the chaos around us. And now that the storm (aka any semblance of hope for a successful season) has moved out, its given everyone a chance to step outside, catch their breath, take stock of the damage and reflect on our respective craziness.

Looking back, I dont think theres anyone player, coach, executive, writer, reporter, fan, big green mascot involved with this Red Sox team who doesnt regret at least one aspect of the way they've acted over this past year. Whether it was something that was said to the media, something that wasnt said to the media, something that was written online, argued at a bar or screamed angrily from the stands, we all have at least one instance that we can reflect on with the benefit of distance and perspective and think: "Eh, I wish I could have that one back." (If you don't place yourself among this company, then you're a better man than I am. Also, you're a liar.)

Anyway, that brings me to a question that was thrown out and discussed last night on UNO's Sports Tonight: Has the media been too harsh on Bobby Valentine?

Or, another way to put it: Has the media been unfair to Bobby Valentine?

Of course, the answer to both questions is an undeniable, size-150-font YES.

The media has been and (especially) was ridiculously unfair to Valentine from the moment he was hired. And while I know that much of what happened is just the nature of the business, this particular situation was worse than anything I've ever seen.

The story I keep coming back to is the day that Bobby V. signed on to do a weekly radio spot with ESPN New York. Remember that little slice of hell? How half the media contingent around here reacted to the news as if they just uncovered a video of Valentine making sweet love to their wives? Yeah, you remember.

So, whatever happened to that weekly radio spot? Oh right. It's still there, and has been every week of this season, without issue. It's been such an unbelievable non-story that I'm sure more than three-quarters of Boston forgot that it even exists.

But at the time, it was an elaborate controversy; another GLARING example of why Valentine was a selfish, self-serving, egotistical prick who was more concerned with his own brand than he was anything having to do with the Boston Red Sox.

In a related story: It was crap.

During this time, everything thing that Valentine did (or didn't do), was painted with that same unreasonable brush. In the eyes of so many local media personalities, Valentine could literally do no right, and there's no question that the obsession with bringing him down before he even stood up, and then as he was trying played a major factor in 2012's legacy as one of the least enjoyable seasons in Red Sox history.

But like I said, we all made mistakes. We all got caught up in the craziness of last year's collapse and this year's struggles and overreacted in our own demented ways. Hell, in the last six months alone, I once spent more than 2,000 words comparing the Sox to a Kanye West mental breakdown, spent hours searching eBay for mean-spirited birthday presents for Josh Beckett and broke into Larry Lucchino's attic to land an interview with a dying and tortured sell-out streak.

And the bottom line is: None of it really mattered.

Even if the media was entirely unfair to Bobby V., it didn't make or break the season. The players who hated their manager didn't need any help. They were as a judgmental and shortsighted as the media themselves. You really think they would have played better or respected their manager more without all the media scrutiny?

And when Valentine is most likely let go at the end of this season, will that be the media's fault? No way. If the media had any real influence on that decision, Valentine would have been fired in April or at the All-Star Break, or after the big trade, or after any one of the million "FIRE BOBBY V NOW!" columns that were written over these past few weeks.

It's not about what's being said in the press; it's about what's going on in the field.

And fair or unfair, that's where Valentine failed. And that's why he's likely, and rather peacefully in the midst of this post-storm calm, on his way out the door.

Rich can be reached at rlevine@comcastsportsnet.com. Follow Rich on Twitter at http:twitter.comrich_levine

Red Sox place Pomeranz on DL, but he may not miss a start

Red Sox place Pomeranz on DL, but he may not miss a start

Roster flexibility, something of substance, or a combination of both?

The Red Sox on Thursday placed Drew Pomeranz on the brand new 10-day disabled list because of a left forearm flexor strain.

"It's become more and more clear he's not ready to begin the season," John Farrell told reporters, including The Providence Journal's Tim Britton, on Thursday morning.

The Sox don’t need a fifth starter, Pomeranz’s potential spot, until April 9. He can be activated before then. So, in effect, the trip to the DL frees up an extra roster spot.

Farrell said the team hopes Pomeranz will be able to make his scheduled start but "is certainly not guaranteeing it."

The situation could prove an interesting look at how MLB handles its new 10-day disabled list. If Pomeranz continues on his previously planned schedule, the Red Sox could be seen as simply be using the 10-day DL to their advantage. But Farrell spoke earlier this spring about how he expected MLB to highly scrutinize trips to the DL.

Pomeranz’s forearm is known not to be in the best of shape, considering he went for a stem-cell injection this offseason.

Porcello 'feels as good as I've felt all spring' in Red Sox' 5-3 loss

usatsi_9925997.jpg

Porcello 'feels as good as I've felt all spring' in Red Sox' 5-3 loss

Rick Porcello and Drew Pomeranz combined to allow all five of the Red Sox' runs in Boston's 5-3 loss to the Minnesota Twins.

Porcello finished his start by fanning four, allowing four hits and earning two runs over four innings. Pomeranz followed in the next four innings with four strikeouts, five hits allowed and three earned runs. Pomeranz allowed ByungHo Park's eighth-inning, two-run homer, which ended up being the game-winner.

Porcello, however, was optimistic after the loss.

"The buildup was good," Porcello told reporters, via RedSox.com. "Today I felt as good as I've felt all spring. At this point, I'm ready to go. I'm looking forward to the start of the season."

While the Sox offense was able to get three runs off Ervin Santana in his 4 2/3 innings, they struggled against the Twins' next five pitchers. Xander Bogaerts (2 of 3) and Pablo Sandoval (1 of 3) managed homers. Hanley (3 of 3) Ramirez had a double, and Dustin Pedroia (2 of 3) had two singles.

Kyle Kendrick will start Thursday in the Sox' final Spring Training series against the Washington Nationals. First pitch is at 1:05 p.m. ET.