Valentine 'surprised' Gonzalez's illness got best of him

773964.jpg

Valentine 'surprised' Gonzalez's illness got best of him

The Red Sox - Yankees series was enough to make Sox fans sick.

As it turns out, it was enough to make Sox players sick, too.

Adrian Gonzalez left after the second inning of Sunday's eventual 7-3 loss to New York due to an illness. Gonzalez had been fighting off the cold before the game, but it didn't seem like it would cost him playing time -- at least not in the eyes of manager Bobby Valentine.

Sure enough though, Gonzalez asked to sit, ending his 18-game hitting streak in the process.

"Yeah he got sick during the game when he was coughing, getting real dizzy, eyes were watering," Valentine said. "He's been on medication for a while.

"... 18-game hitting streak, left it out there with one at-bat. Must have been pretty sick."

Valentine hadn't considered Gonzalez not being able to play, and expressed that after the game.

"It took me by total surprise," he said of Gonzalez needing to sit. "I figure if he's going to say anything, it must be something of notice.

"Nick Punto got a couple hits, was on-base. He did a good job there filling there."

Rosenthal: 'Some' Sox players question Farrell's leadership, game management

red_sox_john_farrell_062716.jpg

Rosenthal: 'Some' Sox players question Farrell's leadership, game management

Fox Sports' Ken Rosenthal ignited a local firestorm when he made a seemingly off-hand comment a few days ago that he "wouldn't be surprised" if the Red Sox fired John Farrell this year. (He quickly added he also "wouldn't be surprised" if Farrell stayed on and led the team to the A.L. East title this year, but that got scant mention.)

Today, however, Rosenthal expounded on Farrell and the Sox in a lengthy column on foxsports.com. While acknowledging the team's injuries and beyond-the-manager's-control inconsistencies (in the starting rotation and with the offense), he also ominously added, "The excuses for the Sox, though, go only so far — all teams deal with injuries, and not all of them boast $200 million payrolls. Other issues also have emerged under Farrell . . . "

Farrell, even when he won the 2013 World Series as a rookie manager, was not popular in all corners of the clubhouse. Some players, but not all, believe that he does not stand up for them strongly enough to the media when the team is struggling, sources say. Some also question Farrell’s game management, talk that exists in virtually every clubhouse, some more than others.

And then he mentioned two leadership problems:

The first occurred during the Red Sox’s prolonged dispute with the Orioles’ Manny Machado. Second baseman Dustin Pedroia, after Matt Barnes threw at Machado’s head, shouted across the field to Machado, 'it wasn’t me,' then told reporters that it was 'definitely a mishandled situation,' without mentioning Barnes or Farrell by name . . . 

The second incident occurred last Saturday, when Farrell engaged in a heated exchange with left-hander Drew Pomeranz in the dugout . . . [Pomeranz's] willingness to publicly challenge Farrell, in an exchange captured by television cameras, offered another indication that the manager and some of his players are not always on the same page.

Hmm.

Rosenthal's piece comes at a time when some of Farrell's harshest local critics are more or less giving him a pass, instead blaming Dave Dombrowski's flawed roster construction for the Sox' early season struggles , , , 

But there has been speculation hereabouts on whether or not Farrell has control of the clubhouse . . . 

Now that Rosenthal has weighed in, that sort of talk should increase.

In the end, Rosenthal makes no prediction on Farrell's future other than to conclude "If Dombrowski senses a change is necessary, he’ll make a change." 

But one prediction that can be made: The should-Farrell-be-fired? debate, which raged at unrealistic levels last year when the Red Sox won the division, isn't going to end anytime soon.