Red Sox bats go silent, lose to O's, 4-1

770296.jpg

Red Sox bats go silent, lose to O's, 4-1

BALTIMORE -- With a chance to go over the .500 mark for the first time this season, the Red Sox bats were silenced by the Baltimore Orioles Tuesday night.

After averaging five runs in the first six games of their current road trip, the Red Sox collected just one run on a season-low two hits -- none after the fourth inning -- and lost 4-1 to the Orioles.

Brian Matusz allowed a leadoff single to Adrian Gonzalez in the second inning and a one-out solo homer to Kevin Youkils -- returning from the disabled list -- and nothing else over 6 13 innings.

The Orioles got a two-run homer from Steve Tolleson in the second off Felix Doubront, then doubled their offensive output with a two-run blast by Wilson Betemit in the eighth.

Betemit's homer came off former Orioles Matt Albers, who had previously tossed 11 13 scoreless and hitless innings against his former club.

Doubront, 4-2, turned in what was arguably his best start of the season, allowing just two runs over six innings while walking two and striking out a career-high nine.

The rookie lefty retired 10 of the last 11 hitters he faced, including the final three in a row by strikeout.

After the homer by Youkilis, the Red Sox did not get a baserunner in scoring position the rest of the night and lost to the Orioles for the fourth time in five tries this season and eighth in the last 10 games, dating back to last season.

Rosenthal: 'Some' Sox players question Farrell's leadership, game management

red_sox_john_farrell_062716.jpg

Rosenthal: 'Some' Sox players question Farrell's leadership, game management

Fox Sports' Ken Rosenthal ignited a local firestorm when he made a seemingly off-hand comment a few days ago that he "wouldn't be surprised" if the Red Sox fired John Farrell this year. (He quickly added he also "wouldn't be surprised" if Farrell stayed on and led the team to the A.L. East title this year, but that got scant mention.)

Today, however, Rosenthal expounded on Farrell and the Sox in a lengthy column on foxsports.com. While acknowledging the team's injuries and beyond-the-manager's-control inconsistencies (in the starting rotation and with the offense), he also ominously added, "The excuses for the Sox, though, go only so far — all teams deal with injuries, and not all of them boast $200 million payrolls. Other issues also have emerged under Farrell . . . "

Farrell, even when he won the 2013 World Series as a rookie manager, was not popular in all corners of the clubhouse. Some players, but not all, believe that he does not stand up for them strongly enough to the media when the team is struggling, sources say. Some also question Farrell’s game management, talk that exists in virtually every clubhouse, some more than others.

And then he mentioned two leadership problems:

The first occurred during the Red Sox’s prolonged dispute with the Orioles’ Manny Machado. Second baseman Dustin Pedroia, after Matt Barnes threw at Machado’s head, shouted across the field to Machado, 'it wasn’t me,' then told reporters that it was 'definitely a mishandled situation,' without mentioning Barnes or Farrell by name . . . 

The second incident occurred last Saturday, when Farrell engaged in a heated exchange with left-hander Drew Pomeranz in the dugout . . . [Pomeranz's] willingness to publicly challenge Farrell, in an exchange captured by television cameras, offered another indication that the manager and some of his players are not always on the same page.

Hmm.

Rosenthal's piece comes at a time when some of Farrell's harshest local critics are more or less giving him a pass, instead blaming Dave Dombrowski's flawed roster construction for the Sox' early season struggles , , , 

But there has been speculation hereabouts on whether or not Farrell has control of the clubhouse . . . 

Now that Rosenthal has weighed in, that sort of talk should increase.

In the end, Rosenthal makes no prediction on Farrell's future other than to conclude "If Dombrowski senses a change is necessary, he’ll make a change." 

But one prediction that can be made: The should-Farrell-be-fired? debate, which raged at unrealistic levels last year when the Red Sox won the division, isn't going to end anytime soon.