Jays GM: Boston is Farrell's 'dream job'


Jays GM: Boston is Farrell's 'dream job'

Alex Anthopoulos, the senior vice-president of baseball operations and general manager of the Blue Jays, said the team had no intention of letting John Farrell out of the last year of his contract until Farrell told Anthopoulos soon after the season ended that managing the Red Sox was his "dream job" and that he wanted to pursue the opportunity.

A day or two later, according to Anthopoulos, Red Sox owner John Henry called Blue Jays owner Paul Beeston asking for permission to pursue Farrell, which set the wheels of Farrell's departure in motion.

"This is the one job for Farrell," Anthopoulos said Sunday afternoon on a conference call. "Theres no other city that was more of a perfect fit and a perfect opportunity."

He said the sudden, and unexpected, departure of Terry Francona after the 2011 season led to Farrell's return to Boston after only two seasons in Toronto.

"It was really in a lot of ways a perfect storm of events," he said.

Other highlights of the call:

The Jays' GM also complained of "gamesmanship" -- "Not on our side" -- that caused negotiations to "not go as smoothly as possible." But he also said he had no "issues with Red Sox general manger Ben Cherington, and Beeston doesn't have any issues with the Red Sox ownership group".

Anthopoulos said the compensation issue was negotiated "primarily on ownership level" and that several names were discussed before the teams settled on Mike Aviles. He also said rumors of Adam Lind being involved were "100 percent false."

Anthopoulos also said Farrell's coaches -- hitting instructor Dwayne Murphy, pitching coach Bruce Walton, first-base coach Torey Lovullo, third-base coach Brian Butterfield, bench coach Don Wakamatsu, bullpen coach Pete Walker and coach Luis Rivera -- are "free to explore other opportunities," raising the possibility that some of them may join Farrell in Boston. Lovullo worked in the Boston organization during Farrell's time as Sox pitching coach, and Rivera played for the Red Sox in the 1990s.

Report: Third base among 'major upgrades' Red Sox seek by trade deadline

Report: Third base among 'major upgrades' Red Sox seek by trade deadline

Despite still being owed more than $42 million after this year, Pablo Sandoval's days with the Red Sox appear numbered. So, it's no surprise that landing a third baseman at the trade deadline is a priority.

That's among the "major upgrades" the Sox are seeking by the July 31 deadline, MLB.com columnist Mark Feinsand reports.

With Sandoval now on his second disabled list stint of the season - this time with an ear infection - after turning into what Feinsand calls "a horror tale for the Red Sox," and with fill-ins Josh Rutledge and Deven Marrero holding down third, it's apparent that the position is a glaring need.

"Sandoval is basically a non-entity at this point," a source told Feinsand. "They need to make a move there."

Feinsand mentions the usual suspects - Mike Moustakas of the Royals and Todd Frazier of the White Sox - as possibilities. Also, he wonders if former MVP Josh Donaldson could be pried away from the Blue Jays (if "Dave Dombrowski knocks their socks off") with an offer and if Toronto is still sputtering at the deadline?

Those other upgrades? "Boston is also looking for pitching, both in the rotation and bullpen," Feinsand writes. Again, no surprise there.

Drellich: Red Sox' talent drowning out lack of identity

Drellich: Red Sox' talent drowning out lack of identity

A look under the hood is not encouraging. A look at the performance is.

The sideshows for the Red Sox have been numerous. What the team’s success to this point has reinforced is how much talent and performance can outweigh everything else. Hitting and pitching can drown out a word that rhymes with pitching — as long as the wins keep coming.


At 40-32, the Sox have the seventh-best win percentage (.556) in the majors. What they lack, by their own admission, is an intangible. Manager John Farrell told reporters Wednesday in Kansas City his club was still searching for its identity.

“A team needs to forge their own identity every year,” Farrell said. “That’s going to be dependent upon the changes on your roster, the personalities that exist, and certainly the style of game that you play. So, with [David Ortiz’s] departure, his retirement, yeah, that was going to happen naturally with him not being here. And I think, honestly, we’re still kind of forming it.”

To this observer, the vibe in the Red Sox clubhouse is not the merriest. 

Perhaps, in the mess hall, the players are a unified group of 25 (or so), living for one another with every pitch. What the media sees is only a small slice of the day. 

But it does not feel like Farrell has bred an easygoing, cohesive environment.

Farrell and big boss Dave Dombrowski appeared unaligned in their view of Pablo Sandoval’s place on the roster, at least until Sandoval landed on the disabled list. 

Hanley Ramirez and first base may go together like Craig Kimbrel and the eighth inning. Which is to say, selfless enthusiasm for the ultimate goal of winning does not appear constant with either.

Dustin Pedroia looked like the spokesperson of a fractured group when he told Manny Machado, in front of all the cameras, “It’s not me, it’s them,” as the Orioles and Red Sox carried forth a prolonged drama of drillings. 

Yet, when you note the Sox are just a half-game behind the Yankees for the American League East lead; when you consider the Sox have won 19 of their past 30 games, you need to make sure everything is kept in proportion.

How much are the Sox really hurt by a lack of identity? By any other issue off the field?

Undoubtedly, the Sox would be better positioned if there were no sideshows. But it’s hard to say they’d have ‘X’ more wins.

The Sox would have had a better chance of winning Wednesday’s game if Kimbrel pitched at any point in the eighth inning, that’s for sure. 

Kimbrel is available for one inning at this point, the ninth, Farrell has said.

A determination to keep Kimbrel out of the eighth because that’s not what a closer traditionally does seems like a stance bent on keeping Kimbrel happy rather than doing what is best for the team. The achievement of a save has been prioritized over the achievement of a team win, a state of affairs that exists elsewhere, but is nonetheless far from ideal — a state of affairs that does not reflect an identity of all for one and one for all.

Maybe the Sox will find that identity uniformly. Maybe they’re so good, they can win the division without it.