Rivers: It's an error if Celtics are relying on history


Rivers: It's an error if Celtics are relying on history

ATLANTA With the all-star break less than a month away, the Boston Celtics find themselves for the second year straight year fighting their way from a sub-.500 hole record-wise.

That team rebounded with a strong regular season finish after the all-star break that catapulted them into the postseason and eventually the Eastern Conference finals.

While there are indeed parallels to be drawn between the two, it becomes a dangerous comparison if relied upon too much.

And no matter how much Doc Rivers preaches that this team is different than that, his fellow coaching brethren repeatedly remind him that the C's have had their problems during past regular seasons only to play some of their best basketball when the games truly mattered - the playoffs.

"Not this group," Rivers said following Friday's 123-111 double overtime loss at Atlanta. "The groups in the past, yeah, we had to do that. We had to not play Shaq many minutes, or rest Rasheed (Wallace, now with the New York Knicks) and Kevin (Garnett) and Ray (Allen, now with the Miami Heat) and Paul (Pierce). We got nine new guys here. They've never done this."

But Rivers wouldn't rule out that some of his players may in fact be relying on the C's track record for bouncing back from slow starts, as for the reason they don't play more consistently or with a greater sense of urgency.

"They may be thinking that," Rivers said. "If they are, it's an error."

Kevin Garnett agrees that past success doesn't necessarily make it an accurate predictor of the future.

During the lockout-shortened 2011-2012 season, the Celtics went into the all-star break with a record of 15-17 only to emerge from it by posting a 24-10 record.

"Man, we can't rely on that," Garnett said. "That's the past. This is a whole different group of guys. Guys in the past, that's the past. We're dealing with the present. If we're sitting around waiting on that, then that's a joke. It's about now. It's not about tomorrow, it's about now. Everybody has to look at themselves and see what they can do better to help this team."

Rajon Rondo was instrumental in the Celtics' ability to turn around their season a year ago.

Ditto for Garnett, whose move to center full-time was arguably the biggest adjustment the C's made during their post all-star break surge last season.

But this season has presented the Celtics with a different set of challenges that will make the team's efforts to rebound from a poor start that much tougher.

Boston lost games last season in part because they rested players, similar to San Antonio's Gregg Popovich has done at times this season with Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker.

But there has been no reduction in minutes or sitting core guys this season.

Which means they may not necessarily be as fresh for this second half run as they were last year or in past seasons.

'I don't try to compare any teams of the past of how we turned things around," Rondo said. "It's a different year."

But there is one thing he would like to carry over from past turn-arounds.

"Like in the past, we do have to stay positive," Rondo said. "Try to continue to move forward and dig our way out of this hole."

Bean: Nobody should ever compare Love Actually to the Warriors


Bean: Nobody should ever compare Love Actually to the Warriors

I’ve never met Jemele Hill. I think she and Michael Smith are great and I completely respect her bravery in voicing the unpopular (but correct) opinion that “Bad and Boujee” is good, but not great. This isn’t about Jemele Hill. It’s about a question she asked and an attempt to answer it. 

Hell no it is not. Know why? Because the Warriors are awesome. Know what’s not awesome? Love Actually. 

All that these two things share is that they’re both loaded with stars. The Warriors have Steph, Draymond, Klay and Durant. Love Actually has Liam Neeson, Bill Nighy, Hugh Grant, Colin Firth, Emma Thompson, Alan Rickman, Billy Bob Thornton, a child who kind of looks like Satan, etc. They’re both loaded. 

Yet the Warriors won and there is no debating their greatness. There is absolutely debating Love Actually’s greatness, since it isn’t great.  

It’s at this point that I should disclose that Pete Blackburn and I had a collective two-hour meltdown about all the reasons why Love Actually is terrible. There were lots. That’s why it took two hours. 

Here are some things about the Warriors:

- They won their second NBA title in three years. 

- They went 16-1 in the postseason. 

- Steph Curry made 56 more three-pointers than anyone else in the playoffs.  

- They led the NBA with 115.9 points per game. 

Here are some things about Love Actually:  

- The movie starts with a weird 9/11 reference. 

- Casual homophobia is rampant. 

- A widower gets mocked for his sexual inactivity very recently after his damn wife died. 

- The movie likely birthed thousands of eating disorders. 

- A guy decides to cross his best friend and make a run at that guy’s wife just so he can break it off immediately. The much coveted lose-lose-lose to ensure a weird life for everyone. 

- Somebody whose job it is to be a people person sexually harasses every woman in his office. 

- The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom has a woman fired because he wants to have sex with her. 

- The writer whose wife cheats on him storyline is literally the most boring thing in the history of the world. It makes The Steps of Knowledge in “Legends of the Hidden Temple” look like “Mad Max: Fury Road.” 

So no, Jemele Hill, “Love Actually” is not the Golden State Warriors of romantic comedies. Know what is? “Crazy, Stupid, Love.” That movie also has a loaded cast (and a better one, at that) with outstanding execution. 

Steph Curry is Cal. Six teams passed on him, but he made them rue the day. Draymond Green is Jacob, as he pulls a lot of stunts but he’s as lovable as lovable gets. Kevin Durant is David Lindhagen: He’s got his detractors, but he’s what makes the team the best. 

Love Actually stinks. 

Ray Allen to Celtics fans: ‘Get over it’


Ray Allen to Celtics fans: ‘Get over it’

Regardless of what you think of Ray Allen, the man has a point. 

On his 42nd birthday, Instagram account BostonCeltics4ever posted a picture of Allen in a Celtics uniform saying to like the post to wish Allen a happy birthday. 

As you might expect, a lot of Celtics fans didn’t want to do that because he left the team for the Heat and has since seen teammates Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett talk about him in a less than flattering light. 

As such, fans politely and impolitely commented “no,” leading Allen to respond. 

Said Allen: 

“Y’all need to get over it!!! where were you all when the team tried to trade me. It’s a business, we go where it’s necessary just like you all do in your jobs!!!!I will always be a Celtic no matter what any of you say. Get over it!!!!

“Oh and Thank you everyone for wishing me a happy birthday!!!”

Allen is right. Later in Allen’s tenure, the team tried to trade him to Memphis and Phoenix before he eventually departed in free agency. 

The UConn product spent five seasons in Boston before playing the final two years of his career with the Heat. The C’s gave his No. 20 to Gordon Hayward this offseason.