Referee says 'verbal taunt' got Pierce tossed

191544.jpg

Referee says 'verbal taunt' got Pierce tossed

By A.Sherrod Blakely
CSNNE.com

MIAMI After Paul Pierce was ejected with seven minutes to play after picking up his second technical foul, there was confusion as to exactly what he did to warrant the second technical.

Here's the transcript of pool reporter's interview with the lead official, Danny Crawford, after the game.

Question: What did Paul Pierce do to merit the second technical foul with 7:00 remaining?

Crawford: "It's what we call a verbal taunt. He directed profanity towards Dwyane Wade. And in the rulebook, that is a verbal taunt. And it just so happened to be Pierce's second technical foul."

Question: What did Pierce do for the technical foul after the Jones foul with 7:59 left?

Crawford: "The first technical foul, it was contact during a dead ball. He approached James Jones and got right in his face. There wasn't a head-butt, but he got right into his face after a hard foul."

Question: Why Jones merited a technical with 7:59 remaining?

Crawford: "We just looked at that. It was Jones' hard foul that pretty much precipitated Paul doing what he did. The technical foul on Jones will probably be looked at. He didn't do as much as we thought. We thought he got in and became aggressive or initiated. But after looking at the video, that's something that we'll have to look at again."

Question: And was Wade's technical for the foul, verbal taunting or otherwise?

Crawford: "He actually walked toward Pierce and that's why Wade received his; his walking toward Pierce and then Pierce's reaction to that."

A. Sherrod Blakely can be reached atsblakely@comcastsportsnet.com.Follow Sherrod on Twitter at http:twitter.comsherrodbcsn

Mike Giardi: People in Paul George's camp think Celtics are a great fit

Mike Giardi: People in Paul George's camp think Celtics are a great fit

Mike Giardi reports that there are some people in Paul George's camp that think the Boston Celtics would be a great fit, both short and long-term.

MORE:

Update: Three-way Cavs, Nuggets, Pacers deal for George 'very unlikely'

Update: Three-way Cavs, Nuggets, Pacers deal for George 'very unlikely'

We knew back on the night of the draft that as the Cavaliers desperately looked for a way to pry Paul George out of Indiana, they started involving third teams in the talks (because Indy had no interest in Kevin Love for Paul George straight up, not should they). Phoenix was involved, but that fizzled. So did talks involving Denver.

But those latter ones didn’t die the night of the draft, according to reports that came out over the weekend. Denver, Cleveland, and Indiana were still talking about a three-team deal that would land Love in Denver and George in Cleveland. The challenge for Cleveland was finding the combination of young players and draft picks that Indiana wants in a deal — Indy is rumored to want a lottery pick (preferably high lottery) and a young player or players.

Now that Denver three-team is “very unlikely” to happen, according to Joe Varden of the Cleveland Plain Dealer.

Click here for the complete story.