Haggerty: Canucks take wrong approach to Thomas


Haggerty: Canucks take wrong approach to Thomas

By Joe Haggerty
CSNNE.com Bruins Insider Follow @hackswithhaggs
VANCOUVER The Canucks should have studied their lessons well and known better.If Vancouver had been paying close attention during the Eastern Conference portion of the playoffs, theyd have pinpointed the best way to attack Bs goaltender Tim Thomas headed into a grueling seven game series.Tampa scored five or more goals four times in their seven game series against the Bruins during the conference finals, and -- despite the fact that those gaudy scores were aided by empty net goal situations -- at times Thomas looked to be approaching a human goaltender with normal frailties. Thomas hasnt looked like that mere mortal much of the rest of the time while setting the Bruins franchise record for postseason wins in one season (14), pitching three playoff shutouts for the first time since Gerry Cheevers and Gilles Gilbert teamed up to do it in 1976 and making more saves in one Cup run than anybody else in the history of the NHL Stanley Cup playoffs (701) aside from Vancouver goalie Kirk McLeans 761 saves in 1994.So what did Tampa Bay do?Guy Boucher and the rest of the Lightning heaped praise on Thomas and called him an enigma they couldnt figure out while he made miracles happen on the ice. The verbal bouquets tossed from the Lightning to the Bs goaltender practically provided a path of rose petals from Boston to Florida when the Black and Gold traveled there for road games. It was a love-fest that might have been a little hard to figure out at first, but not when you looked closely enough.The bon mots had to be on the advice of Thomas good friend and former University of Vermont teammate Marty St. Louis, who knows the intrepid Thomas plays inspired, dominant, unique and intimidating between the pipes when that chip on his shoulder enlarges. Practically nobody believed in Thomas as a 37-year-old goalie coming off hip surgery entering this year after he lost his job to the newer Finnish model just out of the showroom.He responded to the doubters by pulling together one of the best individual regular seasons in the history of NHL goaltenders.It was the ultimate unintentional bird to all of his critics and perhaps even to those that had thought about trading him away from Boston after last seasons problems.So what did Vancouver coach Alain Vigneault, prototype butterfly goaltender Roberto Luongo and the rest of the Canucks do with that vital piece of hockey intelligence sitting right in their laps?They ignored it and did the one thing that an opponent cant do against Thomas: offend him, rile him up and attack him as a goalie without style thats operating outside the conventional rules of hockey.Vigneault criticized Thomas for venturing too far out of the blue painted area, for trying to draw penalties during his aggressive play and for decking Henrik Sedin when the Canucks forwards tried to skate into his crease. I dont think it was ever an issue to begin with, said Thomas when asked about Vigneaults accusations that appear more akin to a bothersome greenhead fly on Thomas neck in the summertime. It was made an issue by the people that were talking about it. But in reality, it never was an issue.Then Alex Burrows took it a step beyond and whacked the paddle out of Thomas hands in the third period of a one-sided Game 4 at TD Garden.Thomas responded to Burrows with a two-handed slash to the ankles that incited a mini-riot on the ice, but one could argue that Thomas play for the entire series aside from a couple of bad goalsdecisions in a Game Two overtime loss has been giant two-handed slash to the Canucks organization for again disrespecting the Rodney Dangerfield of the NHL. Theyd been getting the butt end of my stick, said Thomas. They did it a couple of times on the power-play in the first period also. I dont know who it was, I was focused on the puck. That was like the third time that hed hit my butt end on that power play. We were up 4-0, the game was getting down toward the end, so I thought Id give him a little love tap and let him know, I know what youre doing, but Im not going to let you do it forever. So thats all that was. It was a typical battle.Who knows?Perhaps the Vancouver team watched their own goaltender melt down amid pointed comments and some good old goalie-crashing over the years, and assumed Thomas would similarly fold up like a cruise deck lounge chair.The Bs goalie is 9-1 in playoff games this year when hes faced 35 shots or more, hes rocking a 1.26 goals against average in the playoffs and a .966 save percentage during the Cup Finals and hes been the driving force behind everything that Boston has accomplished thus far this season.Either way, the Canucks should have known better than to try to rattle the cage of a guy thats had to scrap, battle and will his way up to NHL starter from the bottomless depths of Europe and the independent hockey league system. None of that ever stopped Thomas, so the squeaky wheel Canucks never had a shot at really getting into his kitchen."All Vancouver has done is helped put the Bruins into a 2-2 even series heading into Friday nights Game 5, and continue pushing Thomas on a path to his first Conn Smythe whether the Bruins win, lose or draw in the final three games.On to the links:The Toronto Stars Kevin McGran says that all of the pressure now sits in the lap of the Sedin Twins and Ryan Kesler as the Canucks need to reclaim the series.Bruce Arthur argues that nobody is pure like the soft-driven snow in the Stanley Cup Final, and thats been pretty clearly established in four games between two physical opponents.The TorontoStarsays that loving the Canucks isnt a very easy thing to do. One might argue that hating them would be a lot easier.A NESN.com podcast between Michael Hurley and Jack Edwards for all of those looking for their shot of Jack.A good question-and-answer session with Yahoo! Sports hockey blogger Greg Wyshynski otherwise known as the Puck Daddy. His path to his current job sounds very familiar in a lot of different ways.Speaking of Puck Daddy, the FOH Friend of Haggs wonders if Ryan Kesler can play the hero again for the Canucks after the Bruins have done well to physically pound him in the first few games of the series.A quick overview of the potential Chris Drury buyout by the New York Rangers. So it looks like the Rags went 0-for-2 on those mega-contracts with Drury and Scott Gomez. Huh. Who would have thought that? Response: everybody.Can Roberto Luongo carry his team to victory, or will he forever be known as a guy that couldnt handle the pressure? Interesting questions posed about the Vancouver goaltender.As usual Justin Bourne is right on with his assessment that the Canucks have tried way too hard to play the Bruins style of hockey. Not sure why theyre doing it, but theyll lose if it continues.Bill Simmons writes about the Bruins on his new side project, and I was entertained if nothing else -- and appreciated the Good Will Hunting reference.Nice work by DJ Bean and the WEEI.com crew to get a diary blog from the Green Men for their trip to Boston. It sounds like for the most part they were treated well in the Hub despite a pair of butt-kicking games on the ice.

Joe Haggerty can be reached at jhaggerty@comcastsportsnet.com. Follow Joe on Twitter at http:twitter.comHackswithHaggs

Bean: The (incorrect) case for the Bruins signing Kevin Shattenkirk

Bean: The (incorrect) case for the Bruins signing Kevin Shattenkirk

The Bruins should not sign Kevin Shattenkirk. They really shouldn’t. 

Yet they might. Pierre McGuire said on TSN Radio Tuesday that his guess is that Shattenkirk, arguably the best free agent defenseman on the market, will end up in Boston.

It is remarkable how universally against a Shattenkirk megadeal B’s fans have seemingly been. A Twitter poll with over 3,600 votes this month had Bruins fans preferring Boston sign 40-year-old Zdeno Chara to a two-year, $8 million extension than the 28-year-old  Shattenkirk to a seven-year, $45.5 million deal. 

That is obviously the correct conclusion, but considering how hard the false “Chara is old and bad” garbage is pushed in this town, it’s telling that 64 percent would rather he stick around than the team build the defense around Shattenkirk. 

Of course, Shattenkirk is not a bad player just because he’s been overrated in recent seasons. He’s a decent second-pairing defender and strong power play asset who can be penciled in for 40 points a year. The Bruins already have that in Torey Krug, and he makes less than Shattenkirk figures to command. Shattenkirk is also a righty who plays on the right, which is not a need for the Bruins, whereas Krug is a left shot who plays both sides. 

Add in the Bruins’ cap situation due to some bad contracts and they why of Shattenkirk would be a bad signing doesn’t need to be re-hashed. By this point, the explanation’s been given a few times in a few different places. 

So what would the Bruins’ actual case for signing Shattenkirk be? 


Last season was encouraging for Bruins fans because it saw them reach the playoffs for the first time in three years while also seeing young talent emerge. Yet they still only made the playoffs by two points, something of which Don Sweeney and Cam Neely are undoubtedly aware. 

So for all the good signs, this could be a fringe playoff team again if more improvements aren’t made, and missing the playoffs for the second time in three years would mark a step back in the eyes of ownership, perhaps putting jobs in danger. It would be a shame if money were spent irresponsibly for the sake of saving jobs, but Shattenkirk would definitely make the Bruins better next season, even if it crippled them financially down the road. 


With McAvoy set to be a top-pairing player and Brandon Carlo a good second-pairing option, the Bruins do not have a need for a highly paid right-shot defender. That doesn’t mean they don’t have needs elsewhere. 

Last offseason, Peter Chiarelli made the controversial move of trading Taylor Hall, one of the best left wings on the planet. He did it to get Adam Larsson to help build Edmonton’s blue line up, then he went out and signed Milan Lucic in free agency to replace Hall. 

If the Bruins truly have designs on adding Shattenkirk, perhaps they could have something similar in mind: Trade someone like Carlo for either a left-shot defenseman or a left wing, then replace Carlo with Shattenkirk. 

This would still not be financially palatable, however. When the Oilers traded Hall for Larsson, they swapped a player with a $6 million cap hit for a player with a $4.16 million cap hit and replaced the original player (Hall) with a player in Lucic who carried a $6 million cap hit. So essentially they netted one player for an additional $4.16 million. 

Carlo is on his entry level contract, so unless the Bruins traded him for a player on an entry-level deal, they’d be spending a lot of money in any maneuver that involved replacing him with Shattenkirk. 


Claude Julien’s detractors lamented his affinity for responsibility. They loved it when Bruce Cassidy was more open to trading chances. 

Well, you like trading chances? Shattenkirk’s your guy. He’s a good skater, a good offensive player and a sub-par defender. You put Krug, Shattenkirk and McAvoy as three of your four top-four defenseman and you’ll be a long way from the days of Chara, Seidenberg and Boychuk, for better or worse. 


They for sure should not sign Kevin Shattenkirk. 

Morning Skate: What does trading a first-rounder get you now?

Morning Skate: What does trading a first-rounder get you now?

Here are all the links from around the hockey world and what I’m reading, while wishing that Gordon Hayward and Paul George were already in Boston, like, yesterday.

*FOH (Friend of Haggs) Elliotte Freidman gives his 30 thoughts for the week, including the trade value of a first-round pick right now.

*It could that non-unrestricted free agents steal all of the thunder on July 1 with massive contract extensions a la Connor McDavid.

*PHT writer James O’Brien has the Detroit Red Wings taking potential fliers on a number of veteran D-men that are out on the free market.

*With free agency right around the corner, the legendary Stan Fischler details the sad end to Bobby Orr’s career in Boston, where he was lied to about the offer extended to him and ended up playing things out with the Chicago Blackhawks in a way that it shouldn’t have gone. The sight of Orr in a Blackhawks sweater is one of the real all-time NHL oddities out there.

*The NCAA is eying college hockey expansion in NHL markets, including the University of Illinois and Pitt, and, from what I’ve been told, perhaps UNLV and maybe even Vanderbilt. This is a great thing for amateur hockey players and anybody that can’t get enough of the game.  

*Ex-Senators defenseman Marc Methot holds no ill will toward the Sens after being dealt from Vegas to the Dallas Stars following his selection in the expansion draft.

*Josh Ho-Sang shares his wisdom to Islanders prospects as a 21-year-old somebody that’s gone through the ups and downs of being in their shoes.

*As we referenced above, Connor McDavid is closing in on a massive contract extension with the Edmonton Oilers that will probably make him the highest paid player in the NHL.

*For something completely different: My heart goes out to this Roslindale family fighting through a situation with a child who has a life-threatening disorder. They have a Go-Fund-Me page, so please give if you can.