Ference contributes on offensive end vs. Leafs

191545.jpg

Ference contributes on offensive end vs. Leafs

By DannyPicard
CSNNE.com

BOSTON -- They don't come in bunches for Andrew Ference, that's for sure. But they don't have to.

The Bruins defenseman scored just his third goal of the season on Thursday night -- his first since Jan. 1 -- in a 4-3 shootout loss to the Toronto Maple Leafs at the TD Garden. He did his part in giving the B's a 3-2 lead midway through the second period, on a slap shot from the top of the left circle that found its way past the Maple Leafs' player in front of him, and through the five hole of Toronto goaltender James Reimer.

The Leafs tied the game at 3-3 in the third period, so his goal no longer stood as the game-winner. It would have been nice, had it remained the difference-maker, because not only would it have given the Bruins a win on Thursday night, but it also would have officially crowned them the Northeast Division champs.

Still, it felt good for Ference to put the puck in the net. After all, he doesn't do it very often. But as he, and others pointed out after Thursday night's game, scoring goals isn't Ference's top priority. In fact, it's not even close to a concern.

"It's always fun when one goes in, but I don't know, it's not my main focus," said Ference after the loss. "Obviously, keeping it out of our net is why I have a job.

"We'd be in trouble if it was the other way around, but it's nice to contribute once in a while."

Ference finished Thursday's loss with a game-high plus-2 rating. The only other defenseman to finish with a plus-2 was Adam McQuaid.

Ference is a plus-24 on the season, which ranks 19th overall in the entire NHL. It's a stat that he takes pride in, but also admits that sometimes it's a stat that's not worth worrying about.

"There's absolutely nothing that you can change on certain goals and certain situations," said Ference.

That is true. And Ference wasn't on the ice for any of Toronto's three goals on Thursday night, which means, when he was on the ice, his defense was good enough to help keep the puck out of his own net.

That defensive quality, in itself, is the main reason why Ference is a valuable piece to Boston's championship run.

It doesn't always look pretty when the puck's on his stick, but certainly, he wouldn't be qualified as a "bad" puck-mover. He's a defenseman. He's physical. When he's healthy, he can be a plus player.

His offense has dry spells, no doubt. But again, he's a defenseman. Like he said, he gets paid to play defense, not offense. And while his offense on Thursday night was good enough to help the Bruins earn a point, it's his blue-collar defensive abilities that that team's asking him to utilize in its postseason run.

"He's been good," said Bruins coach Claude Julien after Thursday's loss. "Again, tonight he had a different partner, but for the most part, him and Adam McQuaid have been a really good pair for us.

"I like his competitiveness, I like his mobility, and he moves the puck well."

Danny Picard is on Twitter at http:twitter.comDannyPicard. You can listen to Danny on hisstreaming radio show I'm Just Sayin' Monday-Friday from9-10 a.m. on CSNNE.com.

Bean: The (incorrect) case for the Bruins signing Kevin Shattenkirk

Bean: The (incorrect) case for the Bruins signing Kevin Shattenkirk

The Bruins should not sign Kevin Shattenkirk. They really shouldn’t. 

Yet they might. Pierre McGuire said on TSN Radio Tuesday that his guess is that Shattenkirk, arguably the best free agent defenseman on the market, will end up in Boston.

It is remarkable how universally against a Shattenkirk megadeal B’s fans have seemingly been. A Twitter poll with over 3,600 votes this month had Bruins fans preferring Boston sign 40-year-old Zdeno Chara to a two-year, $8 million extension than the 28-year-old  Shattenkirk to a seven-year, $45.5 million deal. 

That is obviously the correct conclusion, but considering how hard the false “Chara is old and bad” garbage is pushed in this town, it’s telling that 64 percent would rather he stick around than the team build the defense around Shattenkirk. 

Of course, Shattenkirk is not a bad player just because he’s been overrated in recent seasons. He’s a decent second-pairing defender and strong power play asset who can be penciled in for 40 points a year. The Bruins already have that in Torey Krug, and he makes less than Shattenkirk figures to command. Shattenkirk is also a righty who plays on the right, which is not a need for the Bruins, whereas Krug is a left shot who plays both sides. 

Add in the Bruins’ cap situation due to some bad contracts and they why of Shattenkirk would be a bad signing doesn’t need to be re-hashed. By this point, the explanation’s been given a few times in a few different places. 

So what would the Bruins’ actual case for signing Shattenkirk be? 

TO KEEP IT MOVING 

Last season was encouraging for Bruins fans because it saw them reach the playoffs for the first time in three years while also seeing young talent emerge. Yet they still only made the playoffs by two points, something of which Don Sweeney and Cam Neely are undoubtedly aware. 

So for all the good signs, this could be a fringe playoff team again if more improvements aren’t made, and missing the playoffs for the second time in three years would mark a step back in the eyes of ownership, perhaps putting jobs in danger. It would be a shame if money were spent irresponsibly for the sake of saving jobs, but Shattenkirk would definitely make the Bruins better next season, even if it crippled them financially down the road. 

TO PULL A CHIARELLIAN FREE AGENT SWITCHEROO

With McAvoy set to be a top-pairing player and Brandon Carlo a good second-pairing option, the Bruins do not have a need for a highly paid right-shot defender. That doesn’t mean they don’t have needs elsewhere. 

Last offseason, Peter Chiarelli made the controversial move of trading Taylor Hall, one of the best left wings on the planet. He did it to get Adam Larsson to help build Edmonton’s blue line up, then he went out and signed Milan Lucic in free agency to replace Hall. 

If the Bruins truly have designs on adding Shattenkirk, perhaps they could have something similar in mind: Trade someone like Carlo for either a left-shot defenseman or a left wing, then replace Carlo with Shattenkirk. 

This would still not be financially palatable, however. When the Oilers traded Hall for Larsson, they swapped a player with a $6 million cap hit for a player with a $4.16 million cap hit and replaced the original player (Hall) with a player in Lucic who carried a $6 million cap hit. So essentially they netted one player for an additional $4.16 million. 

Carlo is on his entry level contract, so unless the Bruins traded him for a player on an entry-level deal, they’d be spending a lot of money in any maneuver that involved replacing him with Shattenkirk. 

TO GO ALL-IN ON POST-CLAUDE LIFE

Claude Julien’s detractors lamented his affinity for responsibility. They loved it when Bruce Cassidy was more open to trading chances. 

Well, you like trading chances? Shattenkirk’s your guy. He’s a good skater, a good offensive player and a sub-par defender. You put Krug, Shattenkirk and McAvoy as three of your four top-four defenseman and you’ll be a long way from the days of Chara, Seidenberg and Boychuk, for better or worse. 

BUT, KEEP IN MIND . . . 

They for sure should not sign Kevin Shattenkirk. 

Morning Skate: What does trading a first-rounder get you now?

Morning Skate: What does trading a first-rounder get you now?

Here are all the links from around the hockey world and what I’m reading, while wishing that Gordon Hayward and Paul George were already in Boston, like, yesterday.

*FOH (Friend of Haggs) Elliotte Freidman gives his 30 thoughts for the week, including the trade value of a first-round pick right now.

*It could that non-unrestricted free agents steal all of the thunder on July 1 with massive contract extensions a la Connor McDavid.

*PHT writer James O’Brien has the Detroit Red Wings taking potential fliers on a number of veteran D-men that are out on the free market.

*With free agency right around the corner, the legendary Stan Fischler details the sad end to Bobby Orr’s career in Boston, where he was lied to about the offer extended to him and ended up playing things out with the Chicago Blackhawks in a way that it shouldn’t have gone. The sight of Orr in a Blackhawks sweater is one of the real all-time NHL oddities out there.

*The NCAA is eying college hockey expansion in NHL markets, including the University of Illinois and Pitt, and, from what I’ve been told, perhaps UNLV and maybe even Vanderbilt. This is a great thing for amateur hockey players and anybody that can’t get enough of the game.  

*Ex-Senators defenseman Marc Methot holds no ill will toward the Sens after being dealt from Vegas to the Dallas Stars following his selection in the expansion draft.

*Josh Ho-Sang shares his wisdom to Islanders prospects as a 21-year-old somebody that’s gone through the ups and downs of being in their shoes.

*As we referenced above, Connor McDavid is closing in on a massive contract extension with the Edmonton Oilers that will probably make him the highest paid player in the NHL.

*For something completely different: My heart goes out to this Roslindale family fighting through a situation with a child who has a life-threatening disorder. They have a Go-Fund-Me page, so please give if you can.