Bergeron, Kesler at the center of the battle

191545.jpg

Bergeron, Kesler at the center of the battle

By Joe Haggerty
CSNNE.com

VANCOUVER Patrice Bergeron has plenty to play for heading into Wednesday nights Game 1 of the Stanley Cup Finals.

The 25-year-old center is back where he helped Team Canada capture the Gold Medal at the 2010 Winter Olympics, and back in that winning feeling. The city of Vancouver will always remind Bergeron of that joyous experience, which ended with an overtime victory over the United States, and theres a special feeling thats difficult for him to explain when he steps footinto the Rogers Center.

Those memories I'll never forget, said Bergeron, who also ownsa World Junior Championship ona hockey resume that rivals Charlie Sheen for winning. Obviously having a chance to win a gold medal on Canadian soil in Vancouver was something special. Obviously it's some memories and, like I said, I'll never forget. It's fun to come back here.

At the same time, we have a job to do. It's about making sure we concentrate on Game 1, and don't worry about anything else. For me it's about just going out there and playing my game.

There are other things that should be getting Bergerons engine even more revved up than past glory in Vancouver, however. Opposing center Ryan Kesler is a player with whom Bergeron is often grouped when it comes to categorizing elite centers. Both are up for the Selke Trophy, given to the forward who best excels in the defensive aspects of the game, but Bergeron will likely lose the award to Kesler when the final votes are tabulated in Las Vegas. There's no doubt that's on his mind with a unique opportunity to change minds of everyone on the national stage with a strong performance in the Finals.

I think he's a great two-way forward, said Bergeron of Kesler. He's a great player. To be compared to him is nice. At the same time, I'll try to be myself. I'm not even worrying about the comparison. To me, it's about going out there, playing my game.

That being said, he does play a two-way game. He brings a lot to the table . . . Great player.

Its no secret Bergeron values the Selke Trophy, and hes performed well in showdowns with fellow Selke favorites. Bergeron badly outplayed Chicago's Jonathan Toews in late March, and finished with an assist, a plus-2 and seven shots on net in 20:36 of ice time while shutting down Toews and Co. all evening long in a Bruins shutout victory at TD Garden. There was a bit of an attitude in Bergeron's game during that 60 minutes against Chicago, and there's little doubt the Bergie fireshould also be there against Vancouver.

That kind of unending effort should be expected against Kesler, and many of Bergerons teammates are viewing their one-on-one battle as one of the key matchups in the series. He'll need everything he can muster in a battle against his Vancouver mirror image over the next two weeks.

That should be a battle, said Zdeno Chara. Patrice is a guy that always gives everything he has, does such a great job on the faceoff circle and always gives the team everything he has. Kesler brings a lot of same things to the table. That will be something Bergeron will really use as a challenge."

Coach Claude Julien spoke about the BergeronKesler matchup but didnt delve into details of their anticipatedhead-to-head battles, given the B'splan appears to beBergeron matchingup against the Sedin twins to start the series. Still, its hard to imagine the two wont be clashing on big faceoff draws once the Finals get going in earnest.

I have a feeling that Kesler is not going to necessarily be looking at Bergeron much unless it's those big faceoffs at key times," said Julien. "Somehow I have the feeling that both coaches will probably look for something else. If it isn't, then so be it.

But I think when you look at those two players, what they bring to their team are very similar. Patrice has done everything for our team that Kesler has done for his. There's no doubt that you have two players here that are key to their team, guys that you can use in all kinds of situations. For us, it's keying on Patrice being as good as he can be. As I mentioned before, it will be interesting to see the difference between those two, what they bring to the game in these finals.

Both players are known for their strength, both mentally and physically, and their heaviness on the puck. Kesler had little tosay during Tuesday's media day in Vancouver, and seemed more about doing his talking on the ice.

"You know what, for me, I just focus on what I do well . . . and make them adjust, said Kesler. I have a couple things that work. I'm going to try 'em and see what works against 'em.

Kesler has 18 points in the playoffs and Bergeron has 15 points in 16 games. Bergeron is leading the field in faceoff percentage, winning 62.3 percent of his draws to Keslers 54.7 percent.

Both players are so important to their teams, its no stretch to say that whichever one of the two becomes the more dominant physical factor both offensively and defensively will be guiding their team to Stanley Cup victory.

If the Olympic results of last winter hold true again in the Finals for Bergeron, he'll be leaving Vancouver with a familiar winning feeling. And Kesler will be left feeling . . . well . . . something else again.

Joe Haggerty can be reached at jhaggerty@comcastsportsnet.com. Follow Joe on Twitter at http:twitter.comHackswithHaggs

Bean: The (incorrect) case for the Bruins signing Kevin Shattenkirk

Bean: The (incorrect) case for the Bruins signing Kevin Shattenkirk

The Bruins should not sign Kevin Shattenkirk. They really shouldn’t. 

Yet they might. Pierre McGuire said on TSN Radio Tuesday that his guess is that Shattenkirk, arguably the best free agent defenseman on the market, will end up in Boston.

It is remarkable how universally against a Shattenkirk megadeal B’s fans have seemingly been. A Twitter poll with over 3,600 votes this month had Bruins fans preferring Boston sign 40-year-old Zdeno Chara to a two-year, $8 million extension than the 28-year-old  Shattenkirk to a seven-year, $45.5 million deal. 

That is obviously the correct conclusion, but considering how hard the false “Chara is old and bad” garbage is pushed in this town, it’s telling that 64 percent would rather he stick around than the team build the defense around Shattenkirk. 

Of course, Shattenkirk is not a bad player just because he’s been overrated in recent seasons. He’s a decent second-pairing defender and strong power play asset who can be penciled in for 40 points a year. The Bruins already have that in Torey Krug, and he makes less than Shattenkirk figures to command. Shattenkirk is also a righty who plays on the right, which is not a need for the Bruins, whereas Krug is a left shot who plays both sides. 

Add in the Bruins’ cap situation due to some bad contracts and they why of Shattenkirk would be a bad signing doesn’t need to be re-hashed. By this point, the explanation’s been given a few times in a few different places. 

So what would the Bruins’ actual case for signing Shattenkirk be? 

TO KEEP IT MOVING 

Last season was encouraging for Bruins fans because it saw them reach the playoffs for the first time in three years while also seeing young talent emerge. Yet they still only made the playoffs by two points, something of which Don Sweeney and Cam Neely are undoubtedly aware. 

So for all the good signs, this could be a fringe playoff team again if more improvements aren’t made, and missing the playoffs for the second time in three years would mark a step back in the eyes of ownership, perhaps putting jobs in danger. It would be a shame if money were spent irresponsibly for the sake of saving jobs, but Shattenkirk would definitely make the Bruins better next season, even if it crippled them financially down the road. 

TO PULL A CHIARELLIAN FREE AGENT SWITCHEROO

With McAvoy set to be a top-pairing player and Brandon Carlo a good second-pairing option, the Bruins do not have a need for a highly paid right-shot defender. That doesn’t mean they don’t have needs elsewhere. 

Last offseason, Peter Chiarelli made the controversial move of trading Taylor Hall, one of the best left wings on the planet. He did it to get Adam Larsson to help build Edmonton’s blue line up, then he went out and signed Milan Lucic in free agency to replace Hall. 

If the Bruins truly have designs on adding Shattenkirk, perhaps they could have something similar in mind: Trade someone like Carlo for either a left-shot defenseman or a left wing, then replace Carlo with Shattenkirk. 

This would still not be financially palatable, however. When the Oilers traded Hall for Larsson, they swapped a player with a $6 million cap hit for a player with a $4.16 million cap hit and replaced the original player (Hall) with a player in Lucic who carried a $6 million cap hit. So essentially they netted one player for an additional $4.16 million. 

Carlo is on his entry level contract, so unless the Bruins traded him for a player on an entry-level deal, they’d be spending a lot of money in any maneuver that involved replacing him with Shattenkirk. 

TO GO ALL-IN ON POST-CLAUDE LIFE

Claude Julien’s detractors lamented his affinity for responsibility. They loved it when Bruce Cassidy was more open to trading chances. 

Well, you like trading chances? Shattenkirk’s your guy. He’s a good skater, a good offensive player and a sub-par defender. You put Krug, Shattenkirk and McAvoy as three of your four top-four defenseman and you’ll be a long way from the days of Chara, Seidenberg and Boychuk, for better or worse. 

BUT, KEEP IN MIND . . . 

They for sure should not sign Kevin Shattenkirk. 

Morning Skate: What does trading a first-rounder get you now?

Morning Skate: What does trading a first-rounder get you now?

Here are all the links from around the hockey world and what I’m reading, while wishing that Gordon Hayward and Paul George were already in Boston, like, yesterday.

*FOH (Friend of Haggs) Elliotte Freidman gives his 30 thoughts for the week, including the trade value of a first-round pick right now.

*It could that non-unrestricted free agents steal all of the thunder on July 1 with massive contract extensions a la Connor McDavid.

*PHT writer James O’Brien has the Detroit Red Wings taking potential fliers on a number of veteran D-men that are out on the free market.

*With free agency right around the corner, the legendary Stan Fischler details the sad end to Bobby Orr’s career in Boston, where he was lied to about the offer extended to him and ended up playing things out with the Chicago Blackhawks in a way that it shouldn’t have gone. The sight of Orr in a Blackhawks sweater is one of the real all-time NHL oddities out there.

*The NCAA is eying college hockey expansion in NHL markets, including the University of Illinois and Pitt, and, from what I’ve been told, perhaps UNLV and maybe even Vanderbilt. This is a great thing for amateur hockey players and anybody that can’t get enough of the game.  

*Ex-Senators defenseman Marc Methot holds no ill will toward the Sens after being dealt from Vegas to the Dallas Stars following his selection in the expansion draft.

*Josh Ho-Sang shares his wisdom to Islanders prospects as a 21-year-old somebody that’s gone through the ups and downs of being in their shoes.

*As we referenced above, Connor McDavid is closing in on a massive contract extension with the Edmonton Oilers that will probably make him the highest paid player in the NHL.

*For something completely different: My heart goes out to this Roslindale family fighting through a situation with a child who has a life-threatening disorder. They have a Go-Fund-Me page, so please give if you can.