BOSTON Daniel Nava is back in the leadoff spot for the Red Sox tonight against the Tigers for the third straight game.And why not?He has hit in the first spot the last two games, and four times overall in his career. The Sox have won all four games. The last time the Sox won as many of a players first games in the lead-off spot was Steve Lyons first six starts leading off from May 27 through June 9, 1985.Nava had the big hit in the Sox 6-3 win over the Tigers Tuesday night, a two-out, bases-loaded double in the third off Justin Verlander to score all three runners.Thats what you try to teach a player, manager Bobby Valentine said. When the moment is intense, to slow it down. You keep hearing that, that you want to breath and not have things spin too quickly. It seemed like he was all of his at-bats. That at-bat didnt look any different than any of his other at-bats, which is pretty damned phenomenal I think.In 19 games this season, Nava has a .429 on-base percentage. He has reached base safely in 17 of those games.Hes had a pretty good on-base percentage all his life, Valentine said. So he has an ability to see the ball, to not get out of himself.Nava did not even receive an invitation to spring training after spending all of 2011 in the minor leagues despite making his major league debut and playing 60 games the previous season. Valentine has said the switch-hitting outfielder was not even on his radar this spring.Since being called up on May 10, he has started each game in left field.Daniel, his defense has been so good, Valentine said. Hes playing the wall so well. His throws are so accurate. His jumps are so precise. He wouldnt even have to be hitting if you wanted to put him out there because at the beginning of the season that wasnt the case in left field, as some of us might recall. He filled a big hole.Valentine pointed to Nava, along with shortstop Mike Aviles and catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia, as providing some much needed, and perhaps unexpected stability to the team.Mike Aviles and Salty and Daniel could have created a real different situation if they werent playing as well as theyre playing, Valentine said. We had stability with Dustin Pedroia and David Ortiz and Adrian Gonzalez. But if there wasnt stability at those starts, this would be more challenging than it is. Theyve been great.
If you're upset with the way the Red Sox have played recently, well, David Price understands.
But things, he vows, will get better. And he adds that it's only when you've been in the deepest valley that you can appreciate the highest mountain.
Or something like that . . .
Times like this is what makes winning so special!! We will get through this...this is the time we need your support the most! #unity— David Price (@DAVIDprice24) June 28, 2016
After Eduardo Rodriguez's horrific performance Monday night against the Rays -- 11 hits and 9 earned runs allowed in 2 2/3 innings, leading to a 13-7 Red Sox loss to a team that entered the game riding an 11-game losing streak -- the Sox succumbed to the obvious and shipped him back to Pawtucket.
And they got no argument from Sean McAdam.
"I think this is the right move," CSN's Red Sox Insider told Dalen Cuff on Monday night's SportsNet Central. "Because, clearly, the step forward that [Rodriguez] took, however small, last week was more than wiped out and (he) regressed this evening the way he pitched. And things have to be worked out, both in terms of execution and his approach . . . "
In six starts this season covering 29 1/3 innings -- less than five innings a start -- Rodriguez has been, in a word, awful. His 1-3 record is bad enough, but couple that with an 8.59 ERA, an opponents' batting average of .315, a WHIP of 1.74 and nine home runs allowed (a rate that projects out to about 45 homers allowed in a 150-inning season), and you can see why a change had to be made.
“The bottom line is, [Rodriguez] is capable of more," said manager John Farrell.
But now comes the next question: Who replaces him? And that, noted McAdam, has no easy answer.
"What it means for the rotation going forward is completely uncertain," McAdam told Cuff. "In fact, (Red Sox president of baseball operations Dave Dombrowski) told us that there was no corresponding move. Of course, because this turn doesn't come up in the rotation for another five days with the off-day Thursday, it's not anything they need to address (immediately). And in all likelihood, they'll probably get somebody to pitch out of the bullpen here until that turn comes up."
So the Sox get five days to ponder a problem that seems, in many ways unsolvable.
"[There] aren't a lot of good candidates internally," McAdam noted, "and it's unlikely there's going to be any sort of trade . . . in the next four days to fill that spot
Three things we learned from the Boston Red Sox' 13-7 loss to the Tampa Bay Rays