Examining the Francona-Red Sox 'crapstorm'

677854.jpg

Examining the Francona-Red Sox 'crapstorm'

People are trying to draw parallels between the Red Sox' 0-6 start in 2011 and their 1-5 start in 2012, and there's one big difference.
Last year, there wasn't what Tom E. Curran quaintly refers to as "a crapstorm" going on between the front office and one of their former managers on the eve of what the team hoped would be a glorious 100th anniversary celebration of Fenway Park:

Harry Truman used to say "the only thing new in the world is the history you don't know," and, with that in mind, we can be fairly certain that Tito eventually will return. The Herald's Steve Buckley points to Berra v Steinbrenner as proof:

(Although Rich Levine believes Francona may not be back until the current ownership group has moved permanently to Liverpool. And he may be right.)

Judging by your opinions here and especially here (if you haven't done so already, like us on Facebook to join the conversation), a winner has been declared in the court of public opinion . . . and it ain't Larry Lucchino. Unsurprising, to say the least. It's true there's no proof that ownership was Bob Hohler's source for the -- shall we say -- unflattering portrait of Francona in the Boston Globe's post-collapse story last fall, but it's also true that ownership didn't exactly rush to a full-throated defense of Tito. Nor, apparently, did they leave no stone unturned in attempting to find the leak. In Francona's mind, that's disloyalty. In the fans' minds, that's ungratefulness for a guy who was a big part of two World Series championships.
So now we're in a crapstorm.

"The Red Sox are trying to protect their image," said the Globe's Dan Shaughnessy, "Francona's trying to protect his image, and nobody wins."

Amen.

Braintree Municipal Golf helps out those with special needs

snc_golfpkg_0527161464473113238_3450k_1280x720_694884419746.jpg

Braintree Municipal Golf helps out those with special needs

The Braintree Municipal Golf Course helps people with special needs by giving them a chance to take some swings. Here's Kevin Walsh with the full report on a wonderful story.

Three things we learned from the Red Sox’ 10-9 loss to the Blue Jays

red_sox_blue_jays_what_we_learned-overlay-master.png

Three things we learned from the Red Sox’ 10-9 loss to the Blue Jays

Three things we learned from the Boston Red Sox’ 10-9 loss to the Toronto Blue Jays…

1) Toronto’s offense can never be taken lightly.

Coming into the series, the Blue Jays had scored 197 runs, putting them in the middle of the pack among all Major League teams and averaging four runs per game. In the two games against Boston, they’ve scored 17 runs.

So an offense that had appeared to be dormant has been woken up thanks to some subpar Red Sox pitching.

It seems like these two teams are very similar and could be in opposite positions just as easily. The Blue Jays are only three behind in the win column (five in the loss), so Boston needs to win David Price’s Sunday start to widen the gap and cut their three-game skid.

2) Craig Kimbrel is only effective for so long.

Boston’s closer wasn’t giving excuses following Saturday’s game -- and this isn’t one either.

Saturday’s 39-pitch performance wasn’t just his season-high, but his career high in pitches.

This not only resulted in a drop in Kimbrel’s velocity, but it exposed flaws in the Red Sox’ pen. Kimbrel is truly a one-inning guy, so if Junichi Tazawa and Koji Uehara can’t get him the ball, he’s useless.

And it seems like Uehara won’t be used on back-to-back days frequently in the near future, so Boston won’t be able to use Tazawa in a seventh inning role with much consistency.

Somewhere along the way Dave Dombrowski will need to find another reliever for the back-end of the bullpen.

3) Offense can only take a team so far.

Both teams had big offensive days, in large part because pitchers from both sides made a lot of mistakes -- but they still took advantage of them.

Had the Red Sox been the home team in this contest, there’s no reason to believe they wouldn’t have won -- just based on the progression of the game and ignoring any statistical splits.

If the Red Sox are serious about making the postseason, they need pitching to pick up the slack once in a while. Because when they hit the road late in the year, games like will slip away when quality pitching is lacking.