Pats have experience to draw on - good and bad


Pats have experience to draw on - good and bad

FOXBORO -Tom Brady won every single one of his first 10 playoffs starts. That's an NFL record for quarterbacks. Since his first loss at Denver in the Divisional Round after the 2006 season, he's gone 4-5.

In his first playoff run with John Fox' Carolina Panthers, Jake Delhomme played brilliantly and engaged in an epic shootout with Brady before succumbing. In his last playoff start for Fox in Carolina, Delhomme threw five interceptions and fumbled the ball away once.

Experience? It's nice. Execution, though? It wins out every time.

"You can only say one thing about experience," Patriots left tackle Matt Light said Wednesday at Gillette Stadium. "It either served you well or it meant nothing. We hope that for the guys that have been there and done that, that the experience that we have will actually propel us into the next game and do something for us rather than talk about, Hey, we have a lot of guys with experience but we couldnt go out there and show any of it on the field. Thats a long way of saying that I dont think the experience means a whole lot unless you do something positive with it."

The Patriots are in a position Saturday night to change their recent playoff experience - one-and-dones in 2009 and 2010. Yet they go against a Broncos teamwhose most recent playoff experience was a victory less than a week ago in a game that few gave them a chance to win.

A handful of Patriots know what it's like to finish the postseason with a win and see the confetti cannonsunload on their sweaty heads. But those same players also know the razor-thin line betweenthat feeling and the one that comes when all the experience doesn't matter and somebody makes a crazy play (David Tyree) or asimply play goes horribly wrong (the fake punt gone bad against the Jets last January).

And those recent experiences are still fresh, despite the public insistence this week by Bill Belichick and Tom Brady that they arenot on their radars.

"Imean, obviously, we havent done well enough," Light said when asked about the playoff losses in 2009 and 2010. "It sits in all of our minds for the guys that have been here and been a part of that. You work that much, you put that much time into a season, you have success to a degree during the regular season and then you go out and you cant get it done in the postseason; thats a difficult thing to swallow.

"I think thats why guys . . . put a little bit more time in, you put a little more effort into it and hopefully get a better outcome," Light continued. "Were working hard toward that. Weve had a heck of run through the regular season. Weve had a lot of guys step up and make a lot of plays to put us in this position. Now we have to do something with it."

The losses don't fade. Brady said during the preseason that the loss to the Jets last year was something he'd never get over. And Belichick went into a months-long funk after the loss last year.

Asked about the loss to the Patriots in the Super Bowl he experienced as head coach with the Panthers, Fox said on Tuesday, "Oh Lord, I will never forget it. I dont think that I dwell on it, but you know its the only one that Ive been in as a head coach and you know those things are no fun losing."

There is an urgency around the Patriots that borders on desperation sometimes. A tightness. Single-minded focus is a good thing. But mania may not be. And, if you'll allow me to play armchair psychologist, it could be something the Patriots are suffering from. Something they may be able to exorcise during these playoffs.

Having been to the summit, both Belichick and Brady know what it feels like. Each man is blessed football-wise with the presence of the other. They are the winningest head coach-quarterback combo in NFL history and both will go directly to the Hall of Fame on their first ballots. But winning a fourth Super Bowl together has become their white whale.

Consider how close they came with an undermanned team in 2006 - a 21-3 lead in the second quarter over the Colts in the AFC Championship with a mediocre Bears team awaiting them. An 18-0 season in 2007 and then a flat Super Bowl performance. The best record in football and a No. 1 seed in 2010 and then a crushing, mistake-marred loss to their most hated rival.

Their recent experiences, coupled with their early ones give them a unique dynamic. Joe Montana and Bill Walsh weren't at the top for 11 seasons together. Nor were Terry Bradshaw and Chuck Noll. Nor Troy Aikman and Jimmy Johnson, nor Starr and Lombardi. This has been sustained superiority for Brady and Belichick and it wouldn't be a surprise if they both lamented privately that they should have five championships by now.

Fox talked a little more about the experience factor, saying, "Most people describe it as a three-level intensity season. Theres preseason, theres regular season, and theres playoff season. You know I think it reams it up a notch you know because if you lose, you go home. So, I think the idea that the same leadership in any big game is critical whether its playoffs or a division race or what you have through the regular season."

Experience is nice. Execution is better. And how a team lets its experience color or impact its execution is most important of all.

Halftime stars, studs and duds: Celtics hold on to lead after Kings rally back

Halftime stars, studs and duds: Celtics hold on to lead after Kings rally back

BOSTON – The Boston Celtics take a slim 47-46 lead into the half over Sacramento, a team they have dominated at the TD Garden. 

The Celtics are looking to extend their winning streak at home over the Kings to nine in a row with a victory tonight. 

But the Kings are not going to go down easily, as they rallied back from a 13-point deficit in the first quarter. 

After Boston went ahead 29-19, the Kings scored the final 10 points of the quarter to tie it at 29. 

Sacramento took a couple of brief leads in the second, only for the Celtics to get a clutch shot or a timely stop defensively. 

The final points of the half came on a put-back basket by Al Horford which gave Boston a one-point lead that would serve as the margin going into the half. 

Here are the Stars, Studs and Duds from the first half of Friday’s game.



Al Horford

After taking just five shots in Wednesday’s loss to Detroit, Horford had as many in the first six minutes. He would finish the half with 16 points on 7-for-11 shooting which included a pair of three-pointers.

DeMarcus Cousins

He had a horrible first half shooting the ball, but there was no denying Cousins’ presence and impact on the game. Despite missing six of his nine shot attempts he still led them with nine points and five rebounds.



Avery Bradley

He looked a lot more like the Avery Bradley we’ve seen most of this season, and not the one who was a non-factor for most of Wednesday’s loss to Detroit. At the half he had nine points and four rebounds.

Matt Barnes

The oldest player on the floor certainly didn’t look past his prime. The 36-year-old small forward came off the Kings bench to score six points along with grabbing eight rebounds. 



Rudy Gay

A 19.6 points per game scorer this season, Gay couldn’t get into any kind of flow or rhythm offensively. At the half, he had four points on 2-for-8 shooting which included him missing all four of his three-pointers.

Don't expect to see Celtics shy away from 3-pointers

Don't expect to see Celtics shy away from 3-pointers

BOSTON – There were a bunch of numbers from Boston’s 121-114 loss to Detroit on Wednesday that stood out. 

Among the eye-grabbing stats was the fact that the Celtics had taken 42 3s (with 15 makes), an unusually high number of attempts that we may see matched or even surpassed tonight against the Sacramento Kings. 

Don’t count head coach Brad Stevens among those surprised to see the Celtics attempt a lot of three-pointers. 

Last season the Celtics took 26.1 three-pointers per game which ranked 11th in the NBA. 

This season they’re up to 31.2 three-pointers attempted and 11.3 made which both rank fifth in the NBA. 

You can count Kelly Olynyk among the Celtics pleased with the team's increased emphasis on shooting 3s. 

The 7-foot led the NBA in shooting percentage (.405) on 3s taken last season.

"We play a lot of spread offense with four shooters, four perimeter guys," Olynyk, who is shooting 38.1 percent on 3s this season, told "We're trying to make teams shrink their defense and spray out and hopefully make shots. You're making extra passes, giving up good ones for great ones. And we have some pretty good shooters on our team. That's the way we're trying to play. It's just a matter of us making shots."

And the Celtics face a Kings team ranks among the NBA’s worst at limiting 3-point attempts with Sacramento opponents averaging 28.4 three-pointers taken per game which ranks 25th in the league. 

One of Stevens’ main points about three-pointers is while it’s an important shot for them, they need to be the right shot, the right basketball play at the right time. 

And when asked about the 42 attempts against the Pistons, he was quick to acknowledge those were for the most part the right shots to be taken. 

“They are,” Stevens said. “At the end of the day we want lay-ups. And if we don’t get layups, we want the floor to be shrunk. If the defense shrinks in, you’re able to touch the paint and kick out. Two of our last three games, maybe three of the last four, two-thirds of our possessions we touched the paint or shrunk the defense with a roll. That’s our objective. We’re not a team that gets to the foul line a lot. We’re not a team that rebounds at a high rate. And we haven’t scored in transition. To be able to be sitting where we are offensively, a big reason is because we space the floor.”