Rask takes blame for Bruins' one point vs. Rangers


Rask takes blame for Bruins' one point vs. Rangers

BOSTON -- You could make the argument that the Bruins owed Tuukka Rask a favor.

So many times already this season, Rask has kept the Bruins in games, leading to wins. Had the Bruins lost in regulation on Tuesday night, it would have been on Rask.

But some way, some how, the pesky Bruins scored a pair of goals in the final 1:31, while Rask had been pulled from the game in favor of the extra skater, and they managed to leave the TD Garden with one point in the 4-3 shootout loss.

Even Rask acknowledged, on this night, he was to blame.

"They kind of saved my ass there, because I didn't deserve the two points today, or one point, because I let up a couple bad ones," said Rask after the loss. "But we definitely, as a team, deserved some points, and they got my back today to get those goals. It was a good chance for me to bounce back in the shootout, for sure."

Rask allowed two goals in four rounds of that shootout, leaving the Bruins with only one point.

But the Bruins should be happy with that one point, based on the way Rask looked on New York's second and third goals of the game, which gave the Rangers a 3-0 lead that they held all the way up until midway through the third period.

The first goal Rask allowed wasn't his fault. It was the result of a shift that Bruins defenseman Andrew Ference probably wishes he could have back.

Ference made one too many passes back to his defensive partner, Adam McQuaid, and as the Rangers kept the puck in the Bruins' zone, Ference had several more chances to get it out, but failed.

Rick Nash took advantage in the slot by sending a pass over to his left as he was falling to the ice, where Carl Hagelin put it into the net from the left post for the 1-0 Rangers lead midway through the first.

But the next two New York goals came from outside shots that Rask -- or most NHL goaltenders fro that matter -- would easily save.

Derek Stepan made it 2-0 in the second period after he snapped a shot from the left circle that just snuck under Rask's glove and into the net. Then, two minutes into the third, Anton Stralman took a shot from the right circle that hit Rask's blocker and then trickled over the goal line, forcing Rask to lose his cool on the ice.

He knew those were pucks he should have stopped.

"The second one was kind of weak, the third one was weak," said Rask. "I think that was the difference.

"We battled hard," added Rask. "They didn't get too many scoring chances. When they got them, they just found a way to put that in. I've got to take some part of that too."

Because of that, Rask described the comeback as "awesome," as he glanced down the ice from the bench, with the net empty to his right.

Rask couldn't help the Bruins secure two points in the shootout. But with the skill-level in today's NHL, it's awfully tough to pin a shootout loss on a goaltender.

Had the Bruins not bailed out Rask and put themselves in the shootout, it would have been Rask's fault.

He took the blame for that. But after all, the Bruins owed him one.

"There's no doubt it balances out," said coach Claude Julien afterwards. "A goaltender will win you some games. And he certainly wasn't bad. There were probably a couple of goals that Tuukka would normally have. But like I said, we battled back, and even though we should have had those, we shouldn't have even allowed them to have that opportunity, had we played a little bit better in front of him."

Thursday, Jan. 19: Torts doesn't think LeBron could play hockey

Thursday, Jan. 19: Torts doesn't think LeBron could play hockey

Here are all the links from around the hockey world, and what I’m reading while wondering if the Bruins are ever going to poop, or get off the pot.
*John Tortorella wants everybody to know that he thinks there isn’t a chance that Lebron James could play hockey.
*In the interest of self-promotion, here’s my radio hit with Toucher and Rich this morning about whether or not Claude Julien should be fired after back-to-back bad losses against the Islanders and Red Wings.
*How did Shane Doan arrive at an unhappy place with the Arizona Coyotes where he now is open to moving elsewhere ahead of the trade deadline?
*Henrik Lundqvist’s season is entering a crisis level based on what he’s done, and the diminished performance level he’s showing as a more mature goaltender.
*A nice piece with a Canadian hockey hero, Hayley Wickenheiser, who recounts some of the legendary moments of her career through a series of pictures.
*I totally respect the work that Travis Yost does, but stating the Bruins should stick with Claude Julien because their shooting percentage is bound to turn around isn’t good enough grounds to keep a floundering situation intact, in my opinion. You need to check where the shots are coming from and how many of those shot attempts are completely missing the net to get a better grasp on some of the reasons behind Boston’s dreadful 10-year low shooting percentage. That would also explain some of the reason why Julien needs to be replaced coaching a team that’s largely content on perimeter shots to do it for them while also only sporadically showing the effort required from a middle class talent type of team.

*The Lightning are struggling at Joe Namath levels right now without Steve Stamkos in their lineup, and they need that to change.
*For something completely different: congrats to the Boston boys in New Edition for a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.