Mike from Attleboro: Chiarelli 'starving the Bear' since Stanley Cup

807840.jpg

Mike from Attleboro: Chiarelli 'starving the Bear' since Stanley Cup

If you arent a black and gold bandwagon jumper, the Minnesota Wild signing both Zach Parise and Ryan Suter to identical contracts should have had a pleasantly familiar feeling to it.

Six years ago the Boston Bruins made a similar splash bringing Zdeno Chara and Marc Savard to the Bruins. At the time, GM to be Peter Chiarelli was still under contract to the Ottawa Senators until July 15th and was strictly forbidden to have any contact with any Senators free agents. So it fell upon acting GM Jeff Gorton to sign the former Ottawa star Chara and Savard, which instantly righted a badly listing franchise.

It was a day that marked the end of the post lockout incompetence and post 1970s championship complacency that became the hallmark of the SindenOConnell regime.

Well a year after the 2011 cup run Peter Chiarelli has managed to keep the incompetence to a minimum, but apparently even a premature evacuation in the first round of the 2012 playoffs isnt enough to stave off another case of post-cup complacency.

It started last summer. The Stanley Cup victory tour hadnt even begun to deposit enormous bar tabs and shirtless rookies across the city, but fans and experts alike were touting this Bruins team as having the best chance to repeat as any in recent NHL history. Usually, this is champagne fueled hubris, but with minimal roster turnover, the Bruins were positioned very well going into the offseason.

Unfortunately, instead of reloading, as forwards Mark Recchi retired and Michael Ryder left via free agency, the Bs settled for talented career under achiever Benoit Pouliot. Instead of correcting the horrific mistake that was the Tomas Kaberle trade, they chose to simply repeat it at a Building 19 price with Joe Corvo. Instead of dealing for impact players, the trade deadline brought roster filler Brian Rolston, Greg Zanon and Mike Mottau. Instead of using Marc Savards money to fuel another championship it was left untouched. None of Peter Chiarellis acquisitions were the kind of players that could provide the Bruins with significant production statistically, nor were they the locker room rallying points needed to rejuvenatemotivate a stagnating team.

As a result, the Bruins' first title defense since 1973 was an underachievement both on and off the ice. Luckily for Bruins fans, Chiarelli blaming the teams first round exit on league parity shows that their rationalizing defeat and excuse making skills are still of a championship caliber.

Since that parity-induced playoff exit, the Bruins front office has shown less activity than Han Solo between Empire and Return of the Jedi. How can a team that underperformed so badly have even less team-building urgency? Yet Chiarelli seems legitimately content to simply re-sign the same roster that was bounced last season, minus their Conn Smythe winning goalie. If what the Red Sox did at the end of the Theo Epstein era was Feeding the Monster, what Chiarellis done since the Bs Stanley Cup Championship is starving the Bear.

Now I will never claim to be the sharpest knife in the draw, but even green rubberized safety scissors can see that bringing back last years team and possibly adding a Top 9 forward isnt going to solve the Bruins parity problems, let alone loading up for a title run. If you havent noticed, this team is bursting at the seams with "Top 9" forwards. And none of those Top 9 forwards could do what this team needed last season: step in for the injured Nathan Horton. This isnt a new problem either. For two years running, this team has entered the offseason with first line players (Savard & Horton) recovering from major concussions. And for two straight years Chiarelli has failed to put an adequate back up plan on the roster during the offseason. Even though the initial reports about Horton are very positive, the fact that this was his second head injury in a year and the length of time he has missed from a moderate hit is still a massive cause for concern. And it is absolutely cause for this team to look above and beyond the usual roster filler.

Despite these facts, the only activity Bs fans have gotten this offseason is in the press. Good news! Tim Thomas waived his no trade clause! OH yeah he still hasnt been dealt. The Bruins made a significant offer to Zach Parise! It was so significant that the Bruins were never mentioned by any prominent hockey writers as they reported incessantly on the former Devil's free agent status. Im sure that after Rick Nash and Bobby Ryan are dealt it will be reported that the Bruins put together super-duper competitive packages to acquire both players.

What this team and its fans need isnt a front office thats content to manage a disappointing season with excuses and press releases. They need a front office that doesnt think simply keeping the band together is enough to contend. They need a GM that will see Jay Feaster losing his mind and take advantage of the situation before Feasters office is padded in rubber. The Parise and Suter signings should be the inspiration needed to return to the daring aggressiveness that laid the foundation for the Bruins revival.

Unfortunately, that probably means the Bruins need to rehire Jeff Gorton.

Haggerty: Bruins would be foolish to deal away Carlo right now

Haggerty: Bruins would be foolish to deal away Carlo right now

There’s been smoke for weeks signaling trade talks between the Boston Bruins and the Colorado Avalanche, and things are reportedly heating up with the Bruins potentially reaching a tipping point with their subpar play on the ice. According to Bleacher Report columnist Adrian Dater, things may be progressing between the two teams because the Bruins are beginning to entertain the idea of trading away 20-year-old top pairing rookie defenseman Brandon Carlo.

Bruins Director of Player Personnel John Ferguson Jr. was expected to be out in Colorado scouting the Avalanche/Blackhawks game on Tuesday night, and perhaps getting a long look at players like Gabriel Landeskog, Matt Duchene and Tyson Barrie among others.

The expectation is that 24-year-old Landeskog is in the middle of these trade discussions, and that he would be one of the players targeted by a Bruins team that could use more size on the wing, and more players that can put the puck in the net. Certainly Landeskog has done that in his brief NHL career after being a No. 2 overall pick, and has four 20-goal seasons on his resume prior to a disappointing, injury-plagued current season in Colorado.

The word around the league was that talks fizzled between the Bruins and Avs previously when Joe Sakic asked about the availability of the Colorado Springs native Carlo, and those discussions hit the same crunching roadblock that Winnipeg did in discussions with Boston about Jacob Trouba.

Perhaps that has changed in the last 24 hours after Cam Neely and Don Sweeney watched their Bruins completely no-show against the worst team in the Eastern Conference, the New York Islanders, on Monday afternoon. Now one would expect that Bruins management is getting desperate feeling that a third “Did Not Qualify” for the Stanley Cup playoffs could be in their future if they don’t make a bold, swift move to shake up their dazed hockey club.

But let’s not pull any punches here. The entire Bruins management group should be fired on the spot if they trade a 20-year-old, top pairing shutdown defenseman on an entry level contract like Carlo unless they are getting a bona fide superstar in return. Carlo, Charlie McAvoy and David Pastrnak should all be young, untouchable assets for a Bruins organization that is years away from legitimately holding a chance at a Stanley Cup.

Landeskog is not a bona fide superstar. He’s a good player that’s topped out at 26 goals and 65 points in the NHL, but he’s also the Captain on a horrendous, underachieving Avalanche team over the last three years.

If the price were right for Landeskog it would make all the sense in the world for the Bruins to deal him, but it’s a giant honking red flag that Colorado is looking to unload a player like him that’s signed for a reasonable $5.5 million price tag over the next four seasons. Teams don’t trade young players like that with term unless there’s more to the story, and that’s something the Bruins would do well to consider before giving up a player that could be a top-4 shutdown defenseman in Boston for the next 10 years.

Teams like the Bruins that are in reloading mode also shouldn’t be trading 20-year-old players for 24-year-old players that have already cashed in on their second contract. That’s exactly how the Bruins can get right back into salary cap trouble, and do it with a team that’s producing far less than the Peter Chiarelli groups that were at least still making the playoffs.  

Certainly the Bruins have other young D-men like Charlie McAvoy, Jakub Zboril and Jeremy Lauzon coming down the pipeline, but none of those defensemen are in the mold of a true shutdown D like the 6-foot-5 Carlo. With Zdeno Chara in the final few years of his career with the Black and Gold, the B’s are going to need Carlo to slide into that defensive stopper role given his size, strength, wing span and willingness to do the dirty work the D-zone.

That goes beyond the simple fact that rebuilding the back end with ALL of those young stud D-men is the best way to actually build the Bruins back up into a legitimate Eastern Conference power. 

It would be a giant mistake for the Bruins to ship away a player like Carlo with the hope Landeskog can put Boston over the hump for the playoffs this season, and perhaps ease some of the intense pressure currently weighing on Sweeney and Neely. That kind of desperate move smacks of doing it for all of the wrong reasons, and that’s one way to ensure that the Bruins will never escape the web of mediocrity that they’re currently caught in. 

Haggerty: From top to bottom, still no urgency from Bruins

Haggerty: From top to bottom, still no urgency from Bruins

BRIGHTON -- The Bruins pulled the worst of their no-shows on Monday afternoon in the 4-0 shutout loss to the Islanders.

It was a lethargic, mediocre start in the first period that devolved into the bottom dropping out on the Black and Gold when they allowed three unanswered goals in the second. Then, to top it all off, they showed zero urgency or push to make a comeback in the final period. 

It was “unacceptable” in the words of the Bruins players from beginning to end with careless, elementary mistakes in the defensive zone and absolutely zero sustained push in the offensive zone despite a deceiving 32 shots on net.

So, where was the urgency for a Bruins team that’s barely ahead of the Maple Leafs and Senators in the Atlantic Division despite having played six more games than each of those two?

Apparently the Bruins were feeling a little cocky after playing a solid five-game stretch where they’d gone 3-1-1 and taken down the Panthers, Blues and Flyers while elevating their level of play. Heart and soul team leader Patrice Bergeron admitted as much on Tuesday morning as the Bruins cancelled practice and turned their attention toward righting the ship Wednesday night in Detroit.

It was frankly a little stunning to hear Bergeron admit that his Bruins team thought they could win just by showing up on Monday afternoon, but that’s exactly what he copped to in something of an apologetic way.

Brad Marchand said Monday postgame that the Bruins “just weren’t ready [to play]” against the Islanders, and it sounded like his linemate agreed with him.

“It’s about realizing that you can’t take teams lightly, or take the foot off the gas pedal for a period, for a game, or whatever. It hurts us every time we do it, so we have to learn and realize that it just cannot happen. Teams are too good and the points are too valuable for us,” said Bergeron. “You never want to do that, but at the same time maybe it was something that happened because it was a terrible start, and to not respond when they scored the goals. Maybe that’s what happened yesterday.

“As much as you don’t want it to happen, maybe we thought it was going to be an easier game than it actually was against them.”

On the one hand, it’s somewhat shocking to hear that admission from a player that’s always played with full work ethic and an effort level that’s never been questioned. But Bergeron was also a minus-3 in the 4-0 loss and was every bit as guilty as everybody else up and down the roster for the team’s most pathetic loss of the season at a time when results are all that matter.

Perhaps this shouldn’t be surprising, though, because the lack of urgency on the bench is mirrored by the lack of urgency upstairs in the Bruins management office right now. Bruins general manager Don Sweeney told the Boston Globe last week that he’s considering a move with the head coach along with a number of other things to spark a team treading water, but it doesn’t feel like a major move is on the horizon with this Bruins team.

Trade talks are still in the formative, discussion stages as GMs like Joe Sakic and John Chayka are overvaluing their players looking for a king’s ransom for guys like Matt Duchene, Gabriel Landeskog, Martin Hanzal and Radim Vrbata. While Claude Julien should be under the microscope with a team sleepwalking its way through perhaps a third season in a row without the playoffs, it also doesn’t feel like the Bruins are going to pull the trigger on that move until the offseason at the earliest.

This humble hockey writer still insists that this playoff-caliber Bruins team plays at times like a one that needs a swift kick in the backside. Perhaps Julien isn’t up for it after 10 long, successful years of battles with the same core group.   

So, what is there to do then besides make cosmetic moves like shipping underperforming Anton Khudobin down to Providence, or rearrange the deck chairs on a third and fourth line that it’s difficult to tell apart on most days in Boston?

If the Bruins front office wants to truly get to the bottom of their team’s lack of urgency on the ice, perhaps a look in the mirror might be in order. Because that same lack of urgency is playing out with a management group that’s watching their team sink into the Atlantic Division muck right now and seems gun-shy on making a move that could rattle cages.

“Right now where we are in the standings, we’ve got a lot of games to play but we’re still in a playoff spot,” said Julien. “We try and play with the expectations that we have, and that’s to do the best with what we’ve got. We’ve got a lot of new faces and we’re trying to build with what we’ve got here moving forward.”

Certainly nobody is talking about trading away their blue chip prospects like Brandon Carlo or Charlie McAvoy, but there are veteran players on Boston’s current roster that aren’t cut out for battling into the postseason with a young team. It’s plain to see when a middling hockey team can’t find the inspiration to go out and take care of business against a bad Islanders group on a sleepy Monday afternoon just a month after they made the same mistake against the same team on home ice.

The Bruins showed in a five-game stretch leading up to the Islanders debacle that they should be held to a higher standard - that of a team that should qualify for the postseason. But one question arose again and again watching the poorest of poor efforts play out on Monday afternoon: why should the Bruins players show any feet-in-the-fire urgency on the ice when it doesn’t feel like there’s much feet-in-the-fire urgency from upper management to improve the flailing hockey club?

Until that organizational dynamic changes, it’s difficult to see things getting much better, or worse, for a Bruins team that looks destined for the mediocre middle once again this season.