16 Sweet 16 thoughts: Part 1

197883.jpg

16 Sweet 16 thoughts: Part 1

By Rich Levine
CSNNE.com

Sixteen random NCAA thoughts as we head to the Sweet 16, including a plot to kidnap the Napa Know How guy . . .

(Part 1 (first eight) today, Part 2 tomorrow . . . )

1. Butler 71, Pitt 70

Im sick of people trying to downplay the PittButler disaster.

First, we all know that Pitt did plenty of things to blow the game before the referees sent Matt Howard to the line.

You can blame Gilbert Brown for missing the free throw, Nasir Robinson for making contact, Jamie Dixon for not having his team mentally prepared, or any number of plays where, had Pitt executed, it never would have had to come down to that ridiculous whistle. They were the No. 1 seed. They were the bigger, stronger and more talented team. If Pitt had taken care of business, the final moments would have been spent killing the clock, not exposing everyone to the most drawn out, cringe-worthy 1.4 seconds in tournament history.

But they didnt get it done. They put themselves in a position to lose, and paid for it. (Cue LeBrons tiny violin).

But even if you want to argue that Pitt deserved to lose, that doesnt justify the tragic way that loss unfolded.

Their season (and some careers) ended on a make-up call. Thats awful.

Im not saying that Robinson didnt foul him; he obviously did. But if it hadnt been for the previous foul on Butler, the refs never would have called it. Never. And that sucks. Regardless of who deserves to win, no one deserves to lose like that. Theres way too much on the line. And ultimately, whether or not it was technically the right thing to of, its just bad for college basketball.

Despite four days of amazing games, the PittButler disaster is what well remember most.

2. NAPA Know How
With the tournament being carried on four channels, youve got a lot more control this year, but theres no escape from commercial hell.

Here are five that haunted your weekend:

1. Napa Know How: Theres no feeling to describe the moment when you click away from a NAPA Know How commercial to a channel thats also playing a NAPA Know How commercial.

The closest thing I can come up with is if youve ever pulled the move where you wake up hung over, take a swig from a glass of water in the kitchen, and then realize its vodka from the night before.

Anyway, with the NBA playoffs on the way, Im actually pretty scared. Im not sure that this thing is just going to die after the tournament, yet I dont think we can survive another flurry. Someone has to take action. My votes for MacGruber.

2. Sprint: Were really supposed to take a company seriously when their CEO needs to look up limitless in the dictionary?

3. Liberty Mutual: LMs latest ad is one of those Pay it Forward deals where one random act of kindness sets off a domino effect of people going out of their way to help strangers. In one scene, a woman hops off the bus to help an old man who dropped some papers. In another, a man lets an overwhelmed mother cut him at the grocery store. Its nothing crazy, but everyone is definitely throwing out some extra effort. So commercial goes on, keeps building momentum, and in the tense final scene we see this girl approach the front of a building, pause dramatically and . . . holds the door open for a blind woman?

Thats basic human decency. You really need inspiration to decide that youre going to hold the door for a blind person? Like Chris Rock said: "This what you're supposed to do . . . "

These are things you start to thinking about in the 10-15 viewings range.

4. Dominos Chicken: I cant wait for them to reveal the results and then discover that my apartments actually in the middle of a cow pasture.

5. McDonalds: Dwight Howard and LeBron dont know what Larry Bird looks like? I guess that could be realistic. But whats not is that Dwight would go to McDonalds an not order a Happy Meal.

3. Brad Stevens becomes Brad Stevens Heading into March, even though he took Butler to the title game last season, a lot of casual college basketball fans still only knew Brad Stevens as that real young coach at Butler. But after this weekend, Brad Stevens is now officially Brad Stevens. No need for any other description.

Its not just that theyre winning again, or maybe its because theyre winning again, but he has a much greater presence this time around. The way he walked off the court after the Pitt game and nailed the postgame interview, then went into the locker room and started chest bumping his players, and was clapping and dancing in the middle of the huddle like the scrappy senior point guard. He was like Coach K and Wojo wrapped in one (Seth Davis just passed out), but far more likable.

Its rare to see a coach like that with his players, especially one whose also so calm and focused on the court, but maybe thats just Brad Stevens. Im sure the Butler faithful knows that well, and now the rest of the country is about to find out.

The only question is where he ends up. Somethingeverything tells me that we wont see the end of his recent 12(!?)-year extension.

4. The President
Like most people, the right side of President Obamas bracket is in trouble.

But unlike most people, he got a secret service escort to the bathroom this morning: What do you think about that?!

Anyway, even though things have begun to unravel for the President (wouldnt be surprised if the refs from PittButler are all audited) he held it down for those first few days; 29-3 in the first two rounds! Can you imagine how annoying he must have been? Yes, Mr. President. We saw your bracket . . . "

5. Reading the Aztecs
San Diego State started the tournament as a wild card. They were the unproven contender from a lesser-known conference, with not as much experience and the burden of playing for a program that had never won a tournament game. They played out west, far away from the spotlight, and only got the national recognition when theyre were facing off with JIMMER.

The untraditional No. 1 or 2 seeds are always candidates for an early exit, and SDSU fit the mold. A lot of people had a hard time believing . . .

So many people, in fact, that San Diego State eventually became a sneaky pick. They were the team that had people thinking Hmm, bet every one else has them losing early . . . why not take a chance? Theyre better than people think. Theyre tough. Theyre athletic. They held their own against JIMMER! And slowly but surely, they started building a little bandwagon. Now . . . who knows what to think?

I think theyre done. There was something about the way they handled themselves down the stretch against Temple that didnt sit well. They had the final shot to win in regulation and the first overtime, but wasted both chances. They threw a ridiculous number of questionable passes in the backcourt, and just didnt look comfortable in the spotlight.

Against Temple, talent won out. But when it comes to Thursdays game with UConn, thats probably it.

6. The All-Tournament Name Team
There arent any God Shammgods in this years crop, but college hoops is always good for a few good names:

Tim Hardaway Jr., Michigan: Are we supposed to just automatically root for the children of our favorite athletes? I couldnt resist with Hardaway Jr.

Momo Jones, Arizona: We need to hear Gus Johnson call a Momo Jones buzzer beater.

Blaise Ffrench, St. Peters: Crazy thing is hes actually from Qqueens

Isaiah Thomas, Washington: Ill have more on him tomorrow, but cant get over the source of his name. If you didnt hear the story, Thomas was named after the Pistons point guardKnicks saboteur, but not because his dad was a Pistons fan. Instead, his dad was a Lakers fan who bet a friend that if the Pistons beat the Lakers in the 1989 Finals, hed name his first kid Isiah. His mom added the extra a in Isaiah to give it a more biblical vibe.

Aziz NDiaye, Washington: Because every good NCAA tournament needs an NDiaye.

7. The extended family of networks
March Madness was never about working the remote.

Back in the day, you set your TV on CBS, forgot everything else and spent the next few weeks hanging with Greg Gumbel (doesnt sound as fun when you think of it that way). It was very low maintenance; it was very contained. CBS controlled everything and all you could do was hope that they treated you right. It didnt always happen, but we dealt with it, because we didnt know better, and took solace in the fact that there was someone out there being paid to make sure we saw the best action.

Over the last few years, they started offering the games on the computer, which added another little wrinkle. But this year, it was on. Three channels: CBS, TBS, TNT and then something called TruTV. Every single game. All over the tube.

With more access, it felt a little more overwhelming. When you didnt have to worry about changing the channel, you didnt have to worry about anything. If something got good, they sent you right there. Now you had to work for it.

And I cant believe Im bitching about this.

Four channels are unbelievable. Its definitely given the tournament viewing experience a different feel, but different isnt always bad.

Lady Gaga taught me that in that song she stole from Madonna.

8. South by Southwest
Imagine if they moved the Packers into the NFC West next season that would be your Southwest bracket, with No. 1 Kansas now fighting for a Final Four birth with No. 12 Richmond, No. 11 VCU and No. 10 Florida State. Not bad.

The region the Jayhawks face off with in the Final Four? Yup, the one region that's already without its No. 1 seed. Everything's coming up Kansas!

It really feels like all the stars once again appear aligned for them to choke against a double-digit seed and fall way short of expectations.

We'll be back tomorrow with Part 2.
Rich Levine's column runs each Monday, Wednesday and Friday (and, like this week, sometimes Tuesdays) on CSNNE.com. Rich can be reached at rlevine@comcastsportsnet.com. Follow Rich on Twitter at http:twitter.comrlevine33

Marcus Smart will get start for Celtics for injured Isaiah Thomas

Marcus Smart will get start for Celtics for injured Isaiah Thomas

As expected, Marcus Smart will get the start for the Boston Celtics tonight against the Orlando Magic in place of the injured Isaiah Thomas. 

Thomas, who leads the Celtics (12-9) in scoring (26.0) and assists (6.2) this season, suffered a right groin injury in Boston’s 107-106 loss at Houston on Monday.

Head coach Brad Stevens explained his decision a few minutes ago.

“He’s started a lot of games here in the past as a point guard,” Stevens told reporters. “He’s basically our sixth starter. It wasn’t one that I had to think a ton about.”

Starting Smart also allows second-year guard Terry Rozier to continue in his role coming off the bench. 

Whether he’s starting or coming off the bench, Smart’s production has been consistent. 

In the five games he has started this season, he has averaged 10.0 points, 4.2 rebounds and 4.0 assists per game. 

His numbers off the bench are almost identical with Smart averaging 9.6 points, 4.0 rebounds and 3.9 assists as a reserve. 

Stevens also mentioned that Amir Johnson would be back in the starting lineup in place of Jonas Jerebko. Earlier in the day, Stevens told reporters the decision to start Jerebko on Monday was strictly because of the matchup with Houston. 

“We have to be able to be flexible in doing that,” Stevens said. “Houston plays four guards. We didn’t feel like we could defend them unless we switch one through four. I thought he (Jerebko) did a pretty good job. This (Orlando) team is different than Houston other than both are super-hot.”

Orlando (10-12) has won four of its last five games in part because of its size, strength and versatility along the frontline which includes Serge Ibaka, Bismack Biyombo and Nikola Vucevic who now comes off the bench. 

And while the Celtics have benefited heavily from the play of their guards, obviously that plan will be amended tonight with Thomas out. 

“He (Thomas) generates a lot in the open offense what we call flow, spread offense,” Stevens said. “So some of those type of things you may not generate at the same rate. But certainly there are other ways that we’ll look to play when he’s not in the game normally, or when we’re trying to play through bigs in the post. You have different ways to play within all your schemes. Hopefully we can play to each other’s strengths and go from there.”